[2025] KEHC 3173 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 3173 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, as the child's aunt and uncle, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for kinship adoption, including demonstrating their physical, emotional, and financial capacity to care for the child. The reports from the guardian ad litem, Change Trust, and the Children Services confirmed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 3173 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: PMW; Applicant: HWM; Respondent: JM
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E217 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
SN Riechi
Legal Topics
Kinship Adoption, Best Interests of Child, Appointment of Legal Guardian
Source Language
en
Family and Children Kinship Adoption Best Interests of Child Appointment of Legal Guardian

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

PMW

Applicant

HWM

Applicant

JM

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for kinship adoption under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Children Act, 2022.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of the biological parents can be dispensed with given their unknown whereabouts.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, as the child's aunt and uncle, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for kinship adoption, including demonstrating their physical, emotional, and financial capacity to care for the child. The reports from the guardian ad litem, Change Trust, and the Children Services confirmed the applicants' suitability and the benefits to the child. The court determined that the whereabouts of the biological parents were unknown, and thus their consent could be lawfully dispensed with. The court applied the principle that the best interests of the child are paramount, as enshrined in Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Children Act, 2022. The...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants PMW and HWM are allowed to adopt JM, who shall henceforth be known as JMM.
  • NW is appointed the legal guardian of the child.