[2002] KEHC 1045 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated exceptional circumstances justifying the grant of an adoption order. The applicant had provided care, love, and security to the infant, who had lost her mother to HIV/AIDS and was previously orphaned. The applicant's financial stability, support from her home...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KEHC 1045 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: C A; Respondent: J M R A (Infant)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 98 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Ruling
- Outcome
- adoption order granted
- Legal Topics
- International Adoption, Child Welfare, Adoption Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C A
Applicant
J M R A (Infant)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant meets the legal and welfare requirements for adoption of the infant under Kenyan law.
- 2 Whether special circumstances exist to justify granting an adoption order to a foreign national.
- 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated exceptional circumstances justifying the grant of an adoption order. The applicant had provided care, love, and security to the infant, who had lost her mother to HIV/AIDS and was previously orphaned. The applicant's financial stability, support from her home country, and commitment to the child's welfare outweighed any concerns regarding race or nationality. The court determined that denying the order would return the child to orphanhood, depriving her of the warmth and security she currently enjoys. The welfare of the child was best served by granting the adoption, and there were no negative factors against the applicant. The court...
Court Disposition
adoption order granted
Orders
- The applicant C A is authorized to adopt J M R A, who shall henceforth be known as C A A.
- The applicant C A is directed to change her will to include C A A as a beneficiary of her estate as a daughter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI H.C. ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 98 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER OF BABY J M R A
BY C A
R U L I N G
C A the applicant is an Education Advisor attached to GOAL, an Irish relief and development organization. She is an Irish national and has taken care & charge of the Infant J since 21st May, 2001. The infant was HIV positive when she was given over to C but since then has been declared HIV Negative. J’s mother died due to HIV AIDS and that is how she came into the fold of New Life Home which caters for orphaned children. I do not know how that home attracts the European nationals wishing to adopt African orphans but that is besides the point so far as this case is concerned.
The applicant has been given glowing references from all the concerned including the Children Officer from the Director, Children’s Service in the office of the Vice President. The applicant is aware that she has to take the infant eventually to her homeland i.e. Republic of Ireland even though she intends to live in this country as long as possible. However, she has support of her family, friends and also the Immigration Department of her country who have stated that on adoption the infant would be given the citizenship of the Republic of Ireland. It is shown that the Republic of Ireland is fast developing into multiracial country and is emerging fast from its cacoon of Hamogenus Society. The applicant has a stable and adequate financial resources which would cater for the needs of the infant if the adoption order is granted despite the provisions of section 4 (3) ( C) of the Adoption Act.
Obviously the applicant and infant are from different races and that fact shall be visible throughout their lives. The applicant has given it a very serious thought and the infant, as observed by me as well as by all concerned, has also developed a bond with her. They have become a part of their respective lives.
If this court does not grant this order what is the future scenario for the infant? She will go back to the life of an orphan and be detached from the life of warmth, love, comfort, & security which this applicant, to the satisfaction of all concerned, is capable and willing to afford to the infant.
In my view I have special circumstances which justify as an exceptional measure to make the order of adoption. I shall not reiterate what is before this court. Suffice it shall be to state that there is no negative aspect against the applicant to make this court weigh the facts of this application. I can unhesitantly state that the welfare of the infant is in Granting of this order.
I therefore order that the applicant C A be authorized to adopt J M R A who shall henceforth be known as C A A. I further direct that C A change her will to include the name of C A A as a beneficiary of her estate as a daughter.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 19th Day of February, 2002.
K. H. RAWAL
J U D G E