[2018] KEHC 7324 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 7324 (KLR)

The court found that this was a kinship adoption, supported by the consent of the minor's biological father as evidenced by a sworn affidavit. The Sub-County Children's Officer's report confirmed the kinship relationship and recommended freeing the child for adoption. The court determined that the omission of a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 7324 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: P W K; Applicant: A N W; Respondent: T M W
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 26 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Ruling on Application for Review of Order Regarding Freeing Certificate in Kinship Adoption
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
AG Ndung'u
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Kinship Adoption, Freeing Certificate Waiver, Parental Consent, Best Interests of Child
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Kinship Adoption Freeing Certificate Waiver Parental Consent Best Interests of Child

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P W K

Applicant

A N W

Applicant

T M W

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Ruling on Application for Review of Order Regarding Freeing Certificate in Kinship Adoption

  1. 1 Whether the requirement for a freeing certificate should be waived in a kinship adoption where parental consent has been given.
  2. 2 Whether the omission of a declaration that the minor is free for adoption constitutes an error apparent on the face of the record.
  3. 3 Whether it is in the best interest of the minor to grant the orders sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that this was a kinship adoption, supported by the consent of the minor's biological father as evidenced by a sworn affidavit. The Sub-County Children's Officer's report confirmed the kinship relationship and recommended freeing the child for adoption. The court determined that the omission of a declaration freeing the minor for adoption was an error apparent on the face of the record. Given the urgency of the minor's need for medical treatment abroad and the best interests of the child, the court held that the requirement for a freeing certificate should be waived. The application for review was therefore allowed, and the waiver granted.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The requirement for a freeing certificate in respect of the minor is hereby waived.
  • Costs in the cause.