[2018] KEHC 9814 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned at birth, and no biological parent had come forward, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. Reports from the guardian ad litem and the Director of Children’s...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 9814 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: JMM; Applicant: RNN; Respondent: Baby JW
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 80 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Abandonment, Best Interests of Child
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JMM
Applicant
RNN
Applicant
Baby JW
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the consent of the biological parents is necessary given the abandonment of the child.
- 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned at birth, and no biological parent had come forward, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. Reports from the guardian ad litem and the Director of Children’s Services confirmed the applicants’ suitability and ability to provide for the child’s welfare. The court determined that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, who had bonded with the applicants and considered them parents. Consequently, the court allowed the adoption, ordered the change of the child’s name, and appointed legal guardians in the event of any eventuality.
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants JMM and RNN are allowed to adopt Baby JW.
- The child shall henceforth be known as JMM and her date of birth shall be 10th June 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 80 OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF
BABY JW.....................MINOR
BY
JMM............1ST APPLICANT
RNN.............2ND APPLICANT
JUDGMENT
The Applicants, JMM and RNN sought by their Originating Summons and Affidavit in support, orders allowing them to adopt Baby JW (hereinafter the child) whose name they want changed to JMM. The Applicants are 40 and 49 years old respectively, married and have not been blessed with children of own save for the 1st applicant’s child from his previous marriage thus the wish to adopt the child. The Applicants filed financial, health and clearance records that confirm that they will cater for the child’s social growth and development.
The child in this matter was presumably born on 10th June 2009. The mother abandoned the baby outside the gate of Mr. and Mrs. JO in Parkroad and her whereabouts are since then unknown. The matter was reported at Pangani Police Station vide OB No. [xxxx]. The child was committed to Happy life Children’s Home on 2nd August 2010 as a child in need of Care and Protection Case No. 227 of 2010 in accordance with Section 119 of the Children Act 2001 vide the Children’s Court in Nairobi.
The child was then placed in the custody of the Applicants for mandatory bonding prior to adoption. He has since then been in their continuous custody and care. According to correspondence from relevant police authorities at Pangani Police Station, no one has come forward to claim the child. KKPI Adoption Society issued a certificate declaring the child free for adoption pursuant to Section 156(1) of the Children Act. The said freeing certificate is Serial No. [xxxx] and the same is dated 29th February 2012 and filed their report on 27th September 2017 and recommended the adoption.
In an application filed on 25th May 2017 the Applicants sought orders that PL be appointed as the child’s guardian ad litem, and that the Director of Children’s Services be ordered to submit a report on the applicants’ fitness to adopt the infant. On 6th October 2017 this Court issued an order appointing PL as the child’s guardian ad litem, and further directing that she and the Director of Children’s Services file their respective reports in court within 60 days.
The guardian ad litem filed a report which favoured the proposed adoption of the child by the Applicants. Another report in respect of the proposed adoption of the child by the Applicant was prepared by the Director of Children’s Services and filed on 30th April 2018. This report was similarly in favor of the proposed adoption. Both reports filed in respect of this proposed adoption have recommended that this Court allows the Applicant to adopt the child.
This is a local adoption. It is evident that the Applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements relative to the adoption of the child. The consents of the biological parents of the child are dispensed with in accordance to Section 159(1) (a) of the Children Act, 2001 since the child was abandoned at birth. This Court is satisfied that the Applicant is qualified and able to take care of the child. The home visit by the guardian ad litem confirms that the Applicant is indeed capable of providing for the child. The Report from the Department of the Children’s Services established that the Applicants have the financial and emotional capability to provide for the upkeep and education of the child. They have no criminal record and are of good health. The child has bonded well with the Applicants according to the Guardian ad litem’sreport. The child considers the Applicants her parents.
After careful examination of the documents presented, it is the opinion of the court that this Adoption would be in the best interest of the child. Hence, this Court allows the Applicants’ application. The Applicants, JMM and RNN are hereby allowed to adopt Baby JW. Henceforth, the child shall be known as JMM and her date of birth shall be 10th June 2009. He is presumed to be a citizen of Kenya by birth. TK and JN the applicants’ pastor and friend respectively are hereby appointed as the legal guardians of the child should any eventuality arise. This Court directs the Registrar General to duly enter this order in the Adoption Children Register. The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
DELIVERED DATED & SIGNED IN OPEN COURT ON 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018.
M.W.MUIGAI
JUDGE FAMILY DIVISION –HIGH COURT