[2006] KEHC 1226 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had fully satisfied the legal requirements for adoption under Section 158 of the Children Act, 2000. The applicants demonstrated sound physical and mental health, good moral character, financial stability, and a genuine emotional bond with the child. All relevant authorities,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1226 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: [Names Withheld]; Respondent: LLL (to be known as JRW)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 51 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- KH Rawal
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
[Names Withheld]
Applicant
LLL (to be known as JRW)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under Section 158 of the Children Act, 2000.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether the applicants are fit and proper persons to be entrusted with the care of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had fully satisfied the legal requirements for adoption under Section 158 of the Children Act, 2000. The applicants demonstrated sound physical and mental health, good moral character, financial stability, and a genuine emotional bond with the child. All relevant authorities, including the Adoption Society, Children Department, and Guardian ad litem, recommended the adoption. The child was legally freed for adoption, and the applicants undertook to assign their life insurance policy to the child. The court was satisfied that the adoption was in the best interests of the child and authorized the adoption, directing that the child's name be changed and...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants are authorized to adopt LLL, who shall henceforth be known as JRW.
- The child's birth date shall be recorded as 12th July, 2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Adoption Cause 51 of 2006
IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF LLL – (AN INFANT)
JUDGMENT
The Applicants herein are presently residents of Kenya by virtue of entry permit No.[particulars witheld]issued on 31st December, 2004.
The 1st Applicant works as Project Director with M/s Global Concern Incorporation a Non-Governmental Organization duly registered in Republic of Kenya and 2nd Applicant is resident of Kenya as a dependant of 1st Applicant.
The Applicants were married on 2nd September, 1995. During the year 2003 the 2nd Applicant miscarried and the couple then decided to adopt a child from Kenya. Their marriage certificate is duly produced before the court. They are Christians by religion. The Applicants were born on 18th November, 1963 and 16th June, 1967 respectively. They have been cleared by Federal Bureau of Investigation of U.S.A. from any criminal records (RRW 30). They both are certified of being in sound health physically and mentally by Dr. G. Tesfaledet (RRW 22 and 23).
As per all reports filed by relevant authorities namely Adoption Society as well as Children Department their physical, mental and financial abilities to look after the welfare of the child are checked and positively recorded.
Furthermore their moral character has been amply certified by Menchville Baptist Church of Newport News, Virginia where 1st Applicant has a home of his parents.
I am more fortified by a letter of Bethany Christian Service a licensed International Adoption Agency in Michigan which has validated the proposed adoption and which can offer the post-adoption supervision.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Social Services has by a letter of 19th October 2005 confirmed that North Carolina Adoption statutes recognize final adoption decrees from the other countries or jurisdictions and afford those foreign born children equal rights and privileges as children born or legally adopted in the said state. The 1st Applicant is a resident of State of North Carolina as per information given to me.
They have also provided a confirmed letter of employment from Aid Sudan Foundation with effect from 15th January, 2007 when their work permit expires (RRW 34).
I have observed during appearances before me the demeanours of the Applicants who had always appeared with the child. I could see their bonding with him and emotional attachment builtin them concerning the child. They have accepted the child as their own and seemed to be anxious on the outcome of these proceedings.
According to the Applicants their wider families are eagerly awaiting to accept the child into their fold. They have given several e-mails from their close families. This is so far as the Applicants are concerned.
The child herein was found abandoned in Oldonyira Division of Isiolo District and taken to Isiolo Police Station on 20th July, 2005. From there the child was referred to Child Welfare Society which in turn applied for a committal order through the District Children’s Officer.
The Applicants heard about the position of the child and entered into Agreement of foster parent with Child Welfare Society on 31st August 2005 and since then the child is under their care and custody. From the photographs shown of the child, when he was taken in, and of his growth till now, it definitely shows that the child is well tended.
The child is freed for adoption by a certificate dated 24th May, 2006 issued by Kenya Christian Homes, a registered Adoption Society under the Children Act, 2000 which has also filed its report.
The Children Department and Guardian ad litem have made their observations in their respective reports. All of them have recommended the adoption of the child.
The Applicants, in the premises of what is stated hereinabove, have satisfied the legal requirements under Section 158 of the Children Act.
But this court has gone beyond by satisfying itself that the Applicants have love and concern for the child.
They have also consented and undertaken that their Life Insurance Policy shall be assigned to the child. A copy of the policy is on record. I order accordingly.
The upshot of all the above is that the Applicants are authorized to adopt LLL as he was named earlier. I further direct that his name shall henceforth be JRW and his birth date be recorded as 12th July, 2005.
I thus direct the Registrar General to make appropriate entries in the Register.
Dated and Signed at Nairobi this 13th day of October, 2006.
K.H. RAWAL
JUDGE
13. 10. 06