[2017] KEHC 2951 (KLR)
The court found that the Applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned at birth, and no biological parent had come forward, allowing the court to dispense with parental consent. Statutory reports from the Adoption Society, the Department of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 2951 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: L G G; Applicant: L W K; Minor: Baby L P (to be known as N N G)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 73 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L G G
Applicant
L W K
Applicant
Baby L P (to be known as N N G)
Minor
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether the consents of the biological parents and children are required or can be dispensed with.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned at birth, and no biological parent had come forward, allowing the court to dispense with parental consent. Statutory reports from the Adoption Society, the Department of Children’s Services, and the guardian ad litem all confirmed the Applicants’ suitability and capacity to provide for the child’s welfare. The court determined that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, as required by law, and that the Applicants were fit and proper persons to be entrusted with parental responsibility. Accordingly, the court granted the adoption,...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The Applicants, L G G and L W K, are allowed to adopt Baby L P, who shall henceforth be known as N N G.
- The child’s date of birth is declared as 5th February, 2003 and place of birth as Nairobi County.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 73 OF 2016
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF
BABY L P...................................................MINOR
BY
L G G…...……………......……….. 1ST APPLICANT
AND
L W K……….…………..……………2ND APPLICANT
JUDGMENT
The Applicants, L G G and L W K sought by their Originating Summons and Affidavit in support, orders allowing them to adopt Baby L P (hereinafter the child) whose name they want changed to N N G. The Applicants are husband and wife. They are 45 and 46 years old respectively. They celebrated their marriage on 25th March, 2000 as per the marriage certificate filed herein marked LL-10. The 1stApplicant is employed as a managing director at [Particulars withheld] and the 2nd Applicant is a business lady. Both Applicants live together in Nairobi. They have two biological children, F G G born on 29th June 2001 and B K G born on 18th August 2004. They have always loved children and have for a long time desired to help a needy child thus they wish to adopt the child.
The child in this matter is presumed to have been born on 5th February 2003 as per the birth certificate of serial number [Particulars withheld] attached. She was found abandoned at Pangani area. This matter was reported at Pangani Police Station and recorded vide O.B number [Particulars withheld]. The child was admitted to New Life Home Trust on 11th February, 2003 for care and protection and this is evidenced by the child’s admission form into the said children center. The Senior Resident Magistrate Children's Court sitting at Nairobi, in accordance with Section 119of theChildren Act 2001, committed the child to the said home on 15th September 2008 vide Protection and Care number [Particulars withheld].
The child was then placed in the custody of the Applicants for mandatory bonding prior to adoption on 7th March 2003. She has since then been in their continuous custody and care. According to correspondence from relevant police authorities at Pangani Police Station, no one has come forward to claim the child. Little Angels Network Adoption Society issued a certificate declaring the child free for adoption pursuant to Section 156(1)of theChildren Act. The said freeing certificate is serial no. 0011672 and the same is dated 7th August 2015.
In an application filed on 18th February, 2016 the Applicants sought orders that M M M be appointed as the child’s guardian ad litem, and that the Director of Children’s Services be ordered to investigate the suitability of the Applicants to adopt the child and submit a report. On 14th September, 2016 this Court issued an order appointing M M M as the child’s guardian ad litem, and further directing that she and the Director of Children’s Services file their respective reports in Court within 45 days.
Before this matter came up for hearing, Little Angels Network on 21st July 2016 filed a report which favoured the proposed adoption of the child by the Applicants. Another report in respect of the proposed adoption of the child by the Applicants was prepared by the Director of Children’s Services and filed on 8th may 2017. This report was similarly in favor of the proposed adoption. All the statutory reports that have been filed in respect of this proposed adoption have recommended that this Court allows the Applicants to adopt the child.
This is a local adoption. It is evident that the Applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements relative to the adoption of the child. The consents of the biological parents of the child are dispensed with in accordance to Section 159(1) (a) of the Children Act, 2001since the child was abandoned at birth. The consents of the biological children of the Applicants are also dispensed with since they are below the age of 18. This Court is satisfied that the Applicants are qualified and able to take care of the child. The home visit by the guardian ad litem confirms that the Applicants are indeed capable of providing for the child. Reports from the Adoption Society and the Department of the Children’s Services established that the Applicants have the financial and emotional capability to provide for the upkeep and education of the child. They both have no criminal records and are of good health. The child has bonded well with the Applicants according to the Guardian ad litem’sreport. The child considers the Applicants her parents.
After careful examination of the documents presented, it is the opinion of the court that this Adoption would be in the best interest of the child. Hence, this Court allows the Applicants’ application. The Applicants, L G G and L W K, are hereby allowed to adopt Baby Z. Henceforth, the child shall be known as N N G. Her date of birth shall be 5th February, 2003. Her place of birth shall be Nairobi County. She is presumed to be a citizen of Kenya by birth. J N and J J W N (1st Applicant’s brother and sister-in-law) are hereby appointed as the legal guardians of the child should any eventuality arise. This Court directs the Registrar General to duly enter this order in the Adoption Children Register. The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged. It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017.
M.W MUIGAI
JUDGE
In presence of:-
.........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
..........................................................................................