[2009] KEHC 920 (KLR)
The court found that Machrose Limited failed to pay an undisputed debt of KShs.85,403,508.60 to Bank of Baroda despite proper statutory demand and notice. The company did not file any response or opposition, and the debt was established to the required standard of proof. The court held that the company is unable to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 920 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Internet Agricultural Services; Respondent: Machrose Limited; Applicant: Bank of Baroda
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Winding Up Cause 3 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; company ordered wound up
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Company Insolvency, Winding Up Petition, Creditor Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Internet Agricultural Services
Applicant
Machrose Limited
Respondent
Bank of Baroda
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Machrose Limited is unable to pay its debts within the meaning of the Companies Act.
- 2 Whether the creditor has established grounds for winding up the company under Section 219(e) and 220 of the Companies Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Machrose Limited failed to pay an undisputed debt of KShs.85,403,508.60 to Bank of Baroda despite proper statutory demand and notice. The company did not file any response or opposition, and the debt was established to the required standard of proof. The court held that the company is unable to pay its debts and is therefore insolvent within the meaning of Sections 219(e) and 220 of the Companies Act. Consequently, the court ordered the winding up of Machrose Limited and directed the appointment of a liquidator as per the statutory provisions.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; company ordered wound up
Orders
- Machrose Limited is ordered to be wound up on account of its inability to pay its debts.
- The creditor, Bank of Baroda, is directed to appoint a liquidator for the purposes of winding up the company.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS)
Winding Up Cause 3 of 2007
IN THE MATTER OF MACHROSE LIMITED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT
JUDGMENT
Internet Agricultural Services (petitioner) petitioned this court to wind up Machrose Limited (the Company)on the grounds that the company had failed or neglected to settle a debt of KShs.210,110/80 despite of twenty one (21) day notice being given pursuant to Section 220 of the Companies Act. The petitioner craved for orders of the court to wind up the company because, in its opinion, the company was insolvent and therefore unable to pay its debts. When the petition was advertised in the Kenya Gazette of 18th May 2007 and the Daily Nation Newspaper of 21st May 2007, Bank of Baroda (the creditor) entered the appearance in the proceedings. The creditor claimed that the company owed it the sum of KShs.85,403,508/60. Thereafter, before the petition was heard, the company settled the debt of the petitioner.
On 22nd February 2008, the creditor applied to the court to be substituted as the petitioner in the proceeding. The creditor’s application was allowed. On 30th July 2009, the petition herein was listed for hearing. Mr. Murugara for the creditor submitted that the company should be wound up pursuant to the provisions of Section 220 of Companies Act on the grounds that the company is unable to pay its debt. He submitted that since the petition was filed, the company has made no effort to settle the debt of over KShs.85 million due to the creditor. The company filed no papers in opposition to the petition. He urged the court to allow the petition. Miss Ithondeka for the company chose not to make any submission in response to the submission made on behalf of the creditor.
I have carefully considered the argument made on behalf of the creditor. Under Section 219 of the Companies Act, a company may be ordered wound up by the court, for among other reasons, inability to pay its debts (See Section 219(e)). Under Section 220 of the Act, a company shall be deemed to be unable to pay its debts if a creditor served the company through its registered office with a demand requiring the company to pay the sum so due and the company has for three weeks thereafter neglected or failed to pay the sum. In the present petition, the creditor established that the company owes it the said sum of Kshs.85,403,508/60. When the present petition was filed, the company had the opportunity to put its side of the story for the court to appreciate its financial position. The company chose not to file any papers in response to the petition. It was therefore clear to the court that the sum claimed by the creditor, being undisputed, is indeed owed by the company to the creditor. The creditor established to the required standard of proof that the company is unable to pay its debts and is therefore insolvent. I therefore order the company to be wound up on account of its inability to pay the creditor.
Under Section 231 of the Companies Act, I direct the creditor to appoint a liquidator for the purposes of winding up the company. The liquidator shall have all the powers specified under Section 241 of the Companies Act. Pursuant to the relevant law, the said receiver shall render account to this court as regard the winding up of the company. The creditor shall have the costs of this petition which shall be recovered on priority from the assets of the company.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2009.
L. KIMARU
JUDGE