[2023] KEHC 17456 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 17456 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had complied with all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act No. 29 of 2022. The child was declared free for adoption by the relevant adoption agency, and all investigative reports, including those from the Guardian Ad Litem and Department of Social Services,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 17456 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: IKS; Applicant: JAO
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E061 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DKN Magare
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Dispensation of Parental Consent, Children's Act Requirements
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Dispensation of Parental Consent Children's Act Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

IKS

Applicant

JAO

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act No. 29 of 2022.
  2. 2 Whether the consent of the biological parents can be dispensed with.
  3. 3 Whether the child is free for adoption and the applicants are suitable adoptive parents.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had complied with all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act No. 29 of 2022. The child was declared free for adoption by the relevant adoption agency, and all investigative reports, including those from the Guardian Ad Litem and Department of Social Services, were favourable. The applicants were found to be suitable adoptive parents, and there was no legal impediment to the adoption. The court further held that the consent of the biological parents could be dispensed with, as the child was free for adoption and such consent was not reasonably obtainable. Accordingly, the court allowed the application for adoption, appointed legal...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The 1st and 2nd applicants are authorised to adopt the minor known as M now known as MCS.
  • The consent of the biological parents is dispensed with.