[2022] KEHC 16013 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act 2022. The child had been abandoned, and despite reasonable efforts, the biological parents or relatives could not be traced, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. The child had been in the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 16013 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: FAO; Applicant: CCD
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause E024 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Abandonment, Best Interests of Child
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FAO
Applicant
CCD
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act 2022.
- 2 Whether the consent of the biological parents or guardian can be dispensed with in the circumstances of abandonment.
- 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act 2022. The child had been abandoned, and despite reasonable efforts, the biological parents or relatives could not be traced, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. The child had been in the continuous care of the applicants for over three months, and all relevant reports from the Adoption Society, children.s officer, and guardian ad litem recommended the adoption. The court concluded that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, providing him with a stable and loving home. Accordingly, the court authorized the adoption, appointed legal guardians, and...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants FAO and CCD are authorized to adopt baby M, who shall henceforth be renamed as MI.
- PDM and AEA are appointed as legal guardians of the baby.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
In re M alias MI (Child) (Adoption Cause E024 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 16013 (KLR) (1 December 2022) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 16013 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kiambu
Adoption Cause E024 of 2021
MM Kasango, J
December 1, 2022
In the matter of
FAO
1st Applicant
CCD
2nd Applicant
Judgment
1. Baby M who is the subject of the adoption cause is a male child estimated to have been born on February 19, 2017. He was abandoned in an open-air market within Naivasha town. The matter was reported at Naivasha police station and was recorded as OB No 72/xx/x/2017.
2. The baby having not been claimed by anyone was committed to receive care and protection at [particulars withheld]. On March 28, 2017 the baby was committed by the children’s court to that Home for a period of 3 years. The Naivasha police station provided an initial letter dated March 29, 2017 confirming the baby was abandoned. That police station wrote another letter dated September 15, 2018 stating that investigations were carried out but the same had not revealed the parents or relatives of the baby. This background of the baby was verified by Little Angels Network Adoption Society. That Adoption Society confirmed that further attempts to trace the baby’s parents or relatives had not been successful and accordingly declared the baby free for adoption on October 3, 2018. The baby was placed into foster care of the applicants, FAO and CCD on February 14, 2018 to date.
3. The applicants were married on June 6, 2018 although they lived together before marriage for 8 years. Their marriage is monogamous. They have not had a child in their relationship and that is their motive to adopt the baby. The Kiambu sub-county children’s office observed during a home visit of applicants’ home that the applicants and the baby have bonded well. This too was the opinion of the guardian ad litem.
4. I have found the applicants have met all the legal requirements of the Children’s Act 2022. Section 184 of that act inter alia requires a child be declared free for adoption by an Adoption Society. The section also requires that the child, the subject of the adoption be in continuous care and control of the applicants for 3 months and an adoption application must be recommended by the Adoption Society.
5. The consent of the baby’s parents or guardian will be dispensed with in view of the provisions of section 187(3) of the act.
6. This adoption is undoubtedly in the best interest of the child. The child has had a stable home with the applicants since February 14, 2018. The reports of guardian ad litem, the children’s officer and the Adoption Society all recommend that an order for adoption of the baby to the applicants be granted. This court has no reservation in that regard.
Disposition 7. The judgment of this court is:-a.The applicants FAO and CCD are hereby authorized to adopt baby M who shall henceforth be renamed as MIOb.PDM and AEA are hereby appointed as legal guardians of the baby.c.The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged.d.The baby’s date and place of birth is declared February 19, 2017 at Kiambu County.e.The baby is presumed to be Kenyan citizen.f.That the registrar general is directed to make the appropriate entries in the adopted children’s register.g.That the consent to this adoption of the biological parent/s or guardian is hereby dispensed with.
JUDGMENT DATED AND DELIVERED AT KIAMBU this 1st day of DECEMBER, 2022. MARY KASANGOJUDGEIn the presence of:-Coram:Court Assistant:- Mourice/JuliaApplicants in person:- present