[2008] KEHC 586 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional hardship or exceptional depravity as required under section 6 of the Matrimonial Causes Act. The allegations of cruelty, desertion, and adultery were not substantiated to the threshold necessary to grant leave for early filing of a divorce...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 586 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Amos Mwaura Wangendo; Respondent: Margaret Wanja Kamau
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 67 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Divorce Petition Before Three Years of Marriage
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- JW Gacheche
- Legal Topics
- Divorce Petition, Leave to File Before Three Years, Exceptional Hardship, Exceptional Depravity, Presumption of Marriage
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amos Mwaura Wangendo
Applicant
Margaret Wanja Kamau
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Divorce Petition Before Three Years of Marriage
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established exceptional hardship or exceptional depravity to warrant leave to file a divorce petition before three years of marriage.
- 2 Whether the period of marriage should be calculated from the date of cohabitation or the date of formal marriage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional hardship or exceptional depravity as required under section 6 of the Matrimonial Causes Act. The allegations of cruelty, desertion, and adultery were not substantiated to the threshold necessary to grant leave for early filing of a divorce petition. The court also noted the importance of considering the possibility of reconciliation and the interests of any children. As such, the statutory bar against filing for divorce within three years of marriage was not displaced, and the application was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application for leave to file a divorce petition before three years of marriage is disallowed.
- The applicant shall bear the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Misc. Appli. 67 of 2007 (OS)
IN THE MATTER OF A PROPOSED PETITION BY AMW FOR THE
DISSOLUTION OF HIS MARRIAGE WITH MARGARET WK
RULING
This is an application by AMOS MWAURA WANGENDO who seeks an order for leave to petition this court for the dissolution of his marriage to MARGARET WANJA KAMAU before the expiry of the mandatory period of three years. The two contracted a civil marriage at the Registrar’s office in Nairobi on 19/9/2006.
He bases his application on several grounds including cruelty, desertion and adultery by his wife, which in his view have led to the breakdown of their marriage. He also contests the paternity of a child who it is claimed is a child of their union.
The application is opposed on all grounds, and if I understood Margaret’s pleadings well, it is her contention that the two have cohabited as man and wife since the year 2000; that there was a presumption of marriage long before they solemnised their marriage during the year 2006, and that in the circumstances he cannot deny the fact that they have been married for more than three years.
In an application of this nature, the court is guided by section 6 of Matrimonial Causes Act Cap 152 of the Laws of Kenya (‘the Act’) which provides that:
(1) No petition for divorce shall be presented to the court unless at the date of the presentation of the petition three years have passed since the date of marriage:
Provided that a judge of the court may, upon application being made to him in accordance with rules made under this Ordinance, allow a petition to be presented before three years have passed on the ground that the case is one or exceptional hardship suffered by the petitioner or of exceptional depravity on the part of the respondent, but, if it appears to the court at the hearing of the petition that the petitioner obtained leave to present the petition by any misrepresentation or concealment of the nature of the case, the court may, if it pronounces a decree nisi, do so subject to the condition that no application to make the decree absolute shall be made until after the expiration of three years from the date of the marriage, or may dismiss the petition without prejudice to any petition which may be brought after the expiration of the said three years upon the same, or substantially the same facts as those proved in support of the petition so dismissed.
(2) In determining any application under this section for leave to present a petition before the expiration of three years from the date of the marriage, the judge shall have regard to the interests of any children of the marriage and to the question whether there is reasonable probability of a reconciliation between the parties before the expiration of the said three years.
(3) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to prohibit the presentation of a petition based upon matters which have occurred before the expiration of three years from the date of the marriage”. (Underlining mine)
I have considered the pleadings herein as well the submissions by both counsel and in my view the applicant who in currently based in the United Kingdom and who alleges cruelty, desertion and adultery by his wife has failed to convince me that his case is one or exceptional hardship, neither has he convinced me that the respondent is guilty of exceptional depravity.
In my humble opinion, marriage is not a one day affair, nor is it a bed of roses, these two ought to explore possibility of reconciliation.
I do in the circumstances disallow this application with costs.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 23rd day of October 2008.
JEANNE GACHECHE
Judge
Delivered in the presence of:
Mr. Makumi for the applicant.
Miss Adhiambo for the respondent.