[2014] KEHC 7830 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 7830 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant demonstrated sufficient connection and interest in the subject of the Originating Summons concerning the presumption of death of Kimani Gituanja. In the absence of opposition from the respondents, and based on the affidavit of service confirming proper notification, the court held...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 7830 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Michael Mungai Kimani, Stephen Njuguna Kimani, Eliud Mbugua Kimani, John Chege Kimani, James Waititu Kimani, Dennis Muriithi Kimani and George Njoroge Kimani; Respondent: Kimani Gituanja (presumed deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 23 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Joinder Application
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Presumption of Death, Joinder of Parties, Succession Proceedings
Source Language
en
Family and Children Presumption of Death Joinder of Parties Succession Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Mungai Kimani, Stephen Njuguna Kimani, Eliud Mbugua Kimani, John Chege Kimani, James Waititu Kimani, Dennis Muriithi Kimani and George Njoroge Kimani

Applicant

Kimani Gituanja (presumed deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Joinder Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be joined as an interested party to the Originating Summons regarding the presumption of death of Kimani Gituanja.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant demonstrated sufficient connection and interest in the subject of the Originating Summons concerning the presumption of death of Kimani Gituanja. In the absence of opposition from the respondents, and based on the affidavit of service confirming proper notification, the court held that it was proper to enjoin the applicant as an interested party to ensure all persons with a legitimate stake in the proceedings are represented. The application for joinder was therefore allowed as prayed.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is hereby enjoined as an interested party to the Originating Summons dated 13th February 2012.
  • The Notice of Motion dated 17th December 2013 is allowed in terms proposed by the applicant.