Kenya Judgment

High Court · High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)

In re M (Baby) [2017] KEHC 3249 (KLR)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the applicant, a sole female, satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption and demonstrated the capacity to care for the child. The court was satisfied that special circumstances existed, as the child had remained in institutional care for an extended period without any male or married couple expressing interest in adoption. The adoption agency's report confirmed that the applicant was the only person available to adopt the child, and it would not be in the child's best interests to remain in the institution. The court concluded that the adoption would serve the child's best interests, providing him with a family environment and security. Accordingly, the adoption was granted, with the applicant assuming all parental rights and duties, and the child declared Kenyan by birth.

Court disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicant, J N G, is allowed to adopt the child Baby M alias S, who shall hereafter be known as PEG.
  • The child is declared to be Kenyan by birth and presumed born on 3rd July 2009.
  • S W G is appointed legal guardian of the child in the event something happens to the applicant.
  • The Registrar-General is directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register.
  • The guardian ad litem is discharged.

02

Material facts

Parties

J N G

Applicant

Baby M alias S (to be known as PEG)

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Adoption Cause / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant, a single Kenyan woman, seeks to adopt Baby M alias S, having cared for him since 2013. She demonstrates financial and emotional capacity to provide for the child. All assessment reports from the adoption society, Director of Children Services, and guardian ad litem are favourable and recommend the adoption. The applicant argues that no other suitable adoptive parent has come forward, constituting special circumstances.
Respondent
There is no formal respondent opposition. The adoption society and guardian ad litem support the application, noting the child has been in institutional care since 2010 and no male or married couple has expressed interest in adopting him. The reports emphasize the child's best interests and the applicant's suitability.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 159(2), Children Act, Cap 141, Laws of Kenya

    A sole female applicant may adopt a male child only if special circumstances exist to justify the order.

  2. 02

    Children Act, Cap 141, Laws of Kenya

    The best interests of the child are paramount in adoption proceedings.

  3. 03

    Children Act, Cap 141, Laws of Kenya

    Once an adoption order is made, it is final and binding during the lifetime of the child, and the child acquires inheritance rights.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the applicant, a sole female, satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption and demonstrated the capacity to care for the child. The court was satisfied that special circumstances existed, as the child had remained in institutional care for an extended period without any male or married couple expressing interest in adoption. The adoption agency's report confirmed that the applicant was the only person available to adopt the child, and it would not be in the child's best interests to remain in the institution. The court concluded that the adoption would serve the child's best interests, providing him with a family environment and security. Accordingly, the adoption was granted, with the applicant assuming all parental rights and duties, and the child declared Kenyan by birth.

Obiter and limits

  • The applicant has been made aware that once the adoption order is made it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child and that the child shall have the right to inherit her property.
  • The applicant cannot give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child.

Court disposition

adoption granted

  • The applicant, J N G, is allowed to adopt the child Baby M alias S, who shall hereafter be known as PEG.
  • The child is declared to be Kenyan by birth and presumed born on 3rd July 2009.
  • S W G is appointed legal guardian of the child in the event something happens to the applicant.
  • The Registrar-General is directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register.
  • The guardian ad litem is discharged.

Source and reliance status

High Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Judgment

[2017] KEHC 3249 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

(FAMILY DIVISION)

ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 14 OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF BABY M akaBABY S

JUDGEMENT

1. The applicant, J N G, is a Kenyan citizen. She is single, having never married. She seeks to adopt Baby M alias S. Her Originating Summons is dated 19th January 2015.

2. The child in question was found abandoned on 14th October 2010 at [particulars withheld] area of Nairobi by good Samaritans, who reported the matter to the Kamukunji Police Station. The child was admitted at the Happy Life Children’s Centre for care and protection. He was later committed to that institution by the Nairobi Children’s Court. The police were unable to trace his relatives. The child was freed for adoption by the KKPI Adoption Society by their certificate number [particulars withheld] of 25th September 2013. He was placed with the applicant on 29th October 2013.

3. To facilitate this adoption, the applicants have been assessed by the KKPI Adoption Society, the Director of Children Services and the guardian ad litem, J W K. The three have compiled and filed their reports in court. That of the Director of Children Services is dated 23rd November 2016, while that of the guardian ad litemis dated 17th January 2017. There are two reports by the KKPI Adoption Society, both undated, filed herein on 12th March 2015 and 21st September 2017. All these reports are favourable and recommend the proposed adoption. The applicant has demonstrated that she has the financial and emotional capability and capacity to take care of the child. The child himself appears to have bonded well with her and he considers her to be his mother.

4. In the opinion of this court it would be in the best interests of the child that he is adopted by the applicant. The applicant will be able to provide a home and a family for the child to grow up in and thereafter be a useful member of the family. Consequently, the applicant shall assume all parental rights and duties of the biological parent in respect of the adopted child; she shall treat the adopted child as if he was born to her. The applicant has been made aware that once the adoption order is made it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child and that the child shall have the right to inherit her property. The applicant cannot give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child.

5. I note that this is a case of a sole female applicant seeking to adopt a male child. I am cognisant of the provisions of section 159(2) of the Children Act, Cap 141, Laws of Kenya, which require me, before I allow a sole female applicant to adopt a male child, to be satisfied that there are special circumstances that justify the order. My attention has been brought to the guidelines for special circumstances, in such cases as the present, that were prepared by the Adoption Committee and were communicated to the court through a letter dated 13th January 2010 addressed to the Registrar of the High Court. One of the considerations being that the applicant is the only person available to adopt the child.

6. According to the undated report of the KKPI Adoption Society filed herein on 21st September 2017, following my ruling dated 19th May 2017, where I had stated that there was no material before me pointing to any special circumstances in this particular case, the subject child had been at the home since September 2010 and no male person or a married couple came forward to express an interest in adopting the said child before the present applicant presented herself. The adoption agency therefore states that the circumstances were special. I am satisfied by that explanation that it would not be in the best interest of the child for him to remain at the institution, and that it would be best that he is committed to the parentage of the present applicant.

7. I am satisfied that all the legal requirements for a local adoption have been met, and I therefore make the following orders:-

(a)That the applicant, JNG, is hereby allowed to adopt the child Baby M alias S, who shall hereafter be known as PEG;

(b)That the said child is hereby declared to be Kenyan by birth; it shall be presumed that he was born on 3rd July 2009;

(c)That SWG is hereby appointed legal guardian of the child in the event something untoward happens to the applicant; and

(d)That the Registrar-General is hereby directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register; and

(e)That the guardian ad litemis hereby discharged.

DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017.

W. MUSYOKA

JUDGE

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Children Act, Cap 141, Laws of Kenya

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.