[2017] KEHC 3719 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 3719 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicant, a sole female, met the special circumstances requirement for adopting a male child because she has a biological child over whom she exercises parental responsibility, as recognized by the Adoption Committee guidelines. The child was abandoned, and no biological parent could be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 3719 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: A A M
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 19 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
MW Muigai
Legal Topics
Adoption of Children, Special Circumstances in Adoption, Consent in Adoption, Best Interests of Child
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption of Children Special Circumstances in Adoption Consent in Adoption Best Interests of Child

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A A M

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Applicant, a sole female, qualifies to adopt a male child under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether special circumstances exist to justify the adoption order in favor of the Applicant.
  3. 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicant, a sole female, met the special circumstances requirement for adopting a male child because she has a biological child over whom she exercises parental responsibility, as recognized by the Adoption Committee guidelines. The child was abandoned, and no biological parent could be traced, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. Reports from the adoption society, the Director of Children’s Services, and the guardian ad litem all confirmed the Applicant’s suitability and the child’s best interests. The Applicant demonstrated financial, social, and emotional capacity to care for the child, and the child had bonded well with her. The adoption was...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The Applicant, A A M, is allowed to adopt Baby M J.
  • The child shall henceforth be known as C J O M.