[2019] KEHC 11599 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The applicants were found to be suitable, stable, and capable of providing a conducive environment for the child. The child had been abandoned, declared free for adoption, and had bonded well with...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 11599 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: PGP; Applicant: VWN
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 48 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- AO Muchelule
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Rights, Guardianship
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PGP
Applicant
VWN
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether all necessary consents and reports have been obtained and considered.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The applicants were found to be suitable, stable, and capable of providing a conducive environment for the child. The child had been abandoned, declared free for adoption, and had bonded well with the applicants. Reports from the guardian ad litem and the Director of Children Services both recommended the adoption. The court determined that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, and that the applicants would assume all parental rights and obligations. The adoption order would be final and binding, and the child would have the right to inherit from the...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants PGP and VWN are allowed to adopt Baby MM.
- Baby MM shall henceforth be known as MTG.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 48 OF 2017 (OS)
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF CHILD MM
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION
BY
PGP..........................1ST APPLICANT
VWN.......................2ND APPLICANT
JUDGMENT
1. The applicants PGP and VWN are a Kenyan couple, aged 60 and 54, respectively. They are both farmers. They solemnized their marriage on 18th October 1986 at PEFA Church, Murang’a. They have no child of their own. They filed the originating summons dated 20th April 2017 seeking to adopt Child MM.
2. Child MM was found abandoned on 23rd July 2001 in [particulars withheld] Bar and Restaurant in Nairobi. Police officers who were on patrol were informed and went for the child. They handed over the baby to the children officers at Nyayo House. It was referred to the Nairobi Children’s Home on the same day. A late entry was later done at Kamukunji police Station vide OB No. 56/7/9/2016. The child was committed to the Centre on 25th October 2001 by the Children’s Court at Nairobi in Protection and Care Number 267 of 2001. On 16th September 2016 the Child was declared free for adoption by Buckner Kenya Adoption Services. He was placed with the applicants on 16th April 2016 for bonding. Through letter dated 7th September 2016, the Police have indicated that no one has come forward to claim the chid and efforts to trace his relatives had been fruitless.
3. On 25th May 2017 the court appointed JAA as the guardian ad litem and ordered her and the Director of Children Services to conduct social inquiry into the suitability of the applicants to adopt the child, and each to file a report within 45 days. The reports were filed, each recommending the applicants be allowed to adopt the child. The reports found that the applicants were socially, emotionally and financially stable and suitable to adopt the child. It was also found that the child and the applicants had bonded well.
4. The court finds that it is in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants. The applicants have demonstrated their ability to provide a conducive home and family environment in which the child will grow and develop. They will assume all parental rights and obligations of the biological parents of the child once adopted, and shall treat him as if he was born to them. They have been made aware that once the adoption order is made, it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child. The child shall have the right to inherit their property. The applicants shall not be able to give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child. The parents of the child have consented to this adoption.
5. Having been satisfied that all the legal requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act have been met, the following orders shall issue:-
a) the applicants PGP and VWN are hereby allowed to adopt Baby MM,
b) Baby MM shall henceforth be known as MTG;
c) the child’s date of birth shall be 23rd July 2001, and shall be presumed to be Kenyan having been found abandoned at Loitoktok Bar and Restaurant in Nairobi, Kenya;
d) FWT is hereby appointed to be the child’s legal guardian in the event of death or incapacity of the applicants before he is of full age and fully self-reliant;
e) the Registrar-General is directed to enter this adoption in the Adopted Children Register; and
f) the guardian ad litem is hereby discharged.
DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 29TH day of JULY 2019.
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE