[2024] KEHC 2918 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 2918 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicants satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2022, including age, residency, and suitability as adoptive parents. The Applicants were vetted and recommended by a registered Adoption Society and the Directorate of Children Services. The child had been...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 2918 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: ZOO; Applicant: MWK
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E006 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Final Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
JRA Wananda
Legal Topics
Adoption Orders, Best Interest of Child, Parental Responsibility, Legal Guardianship
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Orders Best Interest of Child Parental Responsibility Legal Guardianship

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ZOO

Applicant

MWK

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Applicants meet the statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2022.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interest of the child as required by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Children Act, 2022.
  3. 3 Whether the consents of the biological parents and relevant authorities have been properly obtained and adopted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicants satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2022, including age, residency, and suitability as adoptive parents. The Applicants were vetted and recommended by a registered Adoption Society and the Directorate of Children Services. The child had been in their continuous care for the requisite period, and all necessary consents from the biological parents and relevant authorities were properly obtained and adopted. The court was satisfied that the Applicants are financially stable and capable of providing for the child. The best interest of the child, as mandated by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Applicants, ZOO and MWK, are authorised to adopt the child known as Baby N, now to be known as Baby MWWO.
  • The consents of the child’s biological parents are adopted.