[2002] KEHC 1022 (KLR)
The High Court found that the Resident Magistrate's Court at Kiambu lacked jurisdiction to issue and confirm the grant of letters of administration for an estate whose value exceeded Kshs. 200,000, as stipulated by Section 48 of the Laws of Succession Act. Consequently, the grant issued and confirmed by the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KEHC 1022 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant (Name not specified); Respondent: Respondents (Sons of another wife, names not specified)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1197 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Annul Grant
- Outcome
- Grant annulled; fresh grant to issue; estate to be divided equally among specified beneficiaries.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Magistrate Courts, Annulment of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Dependants Under Succession Act
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant (Name not specified)
Applicant
Respondents (Sons of another wife, names not specified)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Annul Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Resident Magistrate's Court had jurisdiction to issue and confirm the grant of letters of administration for an estate valued over Kshs. 200,000.
- 2 Whether the grant issued and confirmed by the Subordinate Court should be annulled for want of jurisdiction.
- 3 Who are the rightful beneficiaries of the deceased's estate under the Laws of Succession Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the Resident Magistrate's Court at Kiambu lacked jurisdiction to issue and confirm the grant of letters of administration for an estate whose value exceeded Kshs. 200,000, as stipulated by Section 48 of the Laws of Succession Act. Consequently, the grant issued and confirmed by the Subordinate Court was declared a nullity and ordered to be annulled. The court further held that the applicant, her two children, and the two respondents are the surviving beneficiaries of the deceased's estate. The estate is to be divided equally between the applicant and her two children on one part and the respondents on the other. The court directed that a fresh grant be issued in...
Court Disposition
Grant annulled; fresh grant to issue; estate to be divided equally among specified beneficiaries.
Orders
- The original confirmed grant is annulled and to be surrendered for cancellation.
- A fresh grant to be issued in the names of the applicant and the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
H.C. SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1197 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF NOAH EARNEST
KAMAU WANGATI (DECEASED)
R U L I N G
The applicant filed the Petition for a grant of letters of administration before Kiambu Resident Magistrate’s Court. The Respondents filed the Cross-Petition but it appears that the applicant was issued with the grant on 13th October, 1997. However, the said grant was confirmed on an application by the Respondents wherein the three parties before me were given 1/3 share of the estate.
The applicant through her lawyer filed an application to review the said order of confirmation. As per the record of the Sub-ordinate Court the same is pending hearing and determination.
Be that as it may, the applicant has filed the present application dated 28th May 2001 seeking to annul the said grant. The application is made under section 76 (a) of the Laws of Succession Act and Rule 44 (1) of the Probate and Administration Rules.
The application is based on three grounds and at the out set I can state that the third ground is not available to the Applicant in law.
The second ground has been taken over by events as the three children named therein have filed an affidavit to state that they do not have any interest in the estate.
The only ground remains to be determined is that of jurisdiction of the Sub-ordinate Court to issue and confirm the grant of letters of administration of the estate in question.
In the petition before the Sub-ordinate Court itself, it is stated that the value of the estate exceeds Kshs.200,000/=. Under the provisions of Section 48 of the Laws of Succession Act the Resident Magistrate, Kiambu did not have jurisdiction to hear and determine the said Succession Cause.
It is trite law that where a court takes it upon itself to exercise a jurisdiction which it does not possess, its decision amounts to nothing and that jurisdiction cannot be conferred by estoppel, consent, acquience or default. ( Please see Court of appeal unreported cases of Wanjiku Muhia V/S Ng’ang’a Mutura C.A. (Nairobi) No. 142 of 2000 and Niazsons (K) Ltd V. China Road & Bridge Co-op C.A. (NRB) No. 187 of 1999).
The grant thus issued and confirmed by the Subordinate Court was a nullity and has to be annulled.
I am then urged to distribute the estate. But how can I distribute an estate without the grant in place. I can only indicate the process of the grant to be issued.
The contention of the Respondent, that the applicant is not the lawful wife of the deceased, cannot be considered serious because in the application of confirmation by themselves they have given 1/3 share to her. That apart, no sufficient evidence is produced to prove that she was not the wife.
The Respondents have also conceded that the deceased sired a child with the applicant and that she came to him with a child of her own and they lived together. If so, that child of the applicant becomes a dependant of the deceased as per the Laws of Succession Act. In any event the applicants have averred that both the children are sired by the Deceased. Gloria Serah Mumbi who swore the affidavit to disclaim her interest along with her two sister has also sworn an affidavit on 2nd July 2001 and averred that the applicant was one of the three wives of the deceased who was her father.
The Respondents are the sons of another wife of the deceased. The children of third wife have waived their rights. They are Gloria Serah Njambi, Patricial Mumbi Kamau and Caroline Kamau. The Respondents’ mother Jane Nunga Newbound was divorced in 1968.
Considering all the facts produced before me I am of an opinion that the Applicant, her two children and two respondents are surviving beneficiaries of the estate of the deceased and that the estate be divided equally between the applicant and her two children on one part and the Respondent on the other.
I can in the premises, further direct under provisions vested in me by Rule 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules, that a fresh grant be issued in the names of the applicant and the Respondents and that before the estate is distributed a fresh survey of the plot of land originally bearing L.R. No. Dagoretti/Thogoto 693 be made and produced before the court.
The original confirmed grant be surrendered to the registry of this court to be cancelled. There shall be mention of the matter on …………………. For further directions and/orders.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 29th day of May,
2002.
K. H. RAWAL
J U D G E.