[2018] KEHC 5955 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 5955 (KLR)

The court found that the pleadings were inconsistent with the documentary evidence regarding the identity of the child, as the child was referred to by three different names in various documents. To ensure procedural regularity and protect the interests of the child, the court held that all names must be included in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 5955 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Kenya Children’s Homes
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 4 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Amendment of Pleadings
Outcome
Application adjourned for amendment of pleadings; conditional dismissal if not amended within 60 days.
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Pleadings Amendment, Child Identity Verification
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Pleadings Amendment Child Identity Verification

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant

Applicant

Kenya Children’s Homes

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Amendment of Pleadings

  1. 1 Whether the pleadings accurately reflect the identity of the child sought to be adopted.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be granted time to amend the pleadings to align with the documentary evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the pleadings were inconsistent with the documentary evidence regarding the identity of the child, as the child was referred to by three different names in various documents. To ensure procedural regularity and protect the interests of the child, the court held that all names must be included in the pleadings. The applicant was therefore granted sixty days to amend the pleadings to reflect all names, failing which the application would be dismissed and the child returned to the institution.

Court Disposition

Application adjourned for amendment of pleadings; conditional dismissal if not amended within 60 days.

Orders

  • Applicant to amend pleadings within sixty (60) days to reflect all names of the child as per the documentary evidence.
  • In default of amendment within sixty (60) days, the Originating Summons dated 21st January 2016 shall stand dismissed.