[2014] KEHC 6353 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The consent of the biological mother was validly obtained, and all statutory reports from the Adoption Society, the Director of Children’s Services, and the guardian ad litem were favorable. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 6353 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: E W R; Applicant: L B K; Respondent: F I M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 291 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Consent
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E W R
Applicant
L B K
Applicant
F I M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether the consent of the biological parent has been properly obtained.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The consent of the biological mother was validly obtained, and all statutory reports from the Adoption Society, the Director of Children’s Services, and the guardian ad litem were favorable. The court observed that the applicants had developed a strong bond with the child, who had been in their continuous care. The applicants demonstrated financial and emotional capability to provide for the child. The court concluded that the adoption was in the best interests of the child and that the applicants were fit and proper persons to be granted the adoption order.
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants, E W R and L B K, are allowed to adopt Baby J.
- The child shall henceforth be known as S I N R.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 291 OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY J
E W R……………….......….1ST APPLICANT
L B K……………………….2NDAPPLICANT
J U D G M E N T
The Applicants, E W R and L B K, are husband and wife. They were married on 20th December 2002. The 1st Applicant is a civil servant employed at the [particulars withheld] as an accountant while the 2nd Applicant is a Research Officer employed with the [particulars withheld]. The Applicants have not been blessed with children of their own due to medical reasons. They wish to adopt a child. They have applied to this court to be allowed to adopt baby J (the child). The child was born on 26th December 2010. The child's biological mother is F I M. Her father is said to have denied paternity. She was given up for adoption to the Kenya Children's Home Adoption Society by her biological mother on 27th December 2010. She cited her inability to raise the child as the reason she was offering the child for adoption. The Nairobi Children's Office was informed of the situation and managed to secure home placement for the child at Thomas Barnardo House for care and protection. She was committed by the Nairobi Children’s Court to the custody of the said Children’s Home on 9th March 2013 pending formal adoption proceedings. The Applicants were given custody of the child for mandatory foster care pending adoption pursuant to a foster care agreement signed on 29th April 2011. They took custody of the child on the same day. Since then, the child has been in the continuous custody and care of the applicants.
Prior to the hearing of the adoption, Kenya Children's Homes, an Adoption Society, prepared a report which is filed in court. They also issued a certificate declaring the child free for adoption. The certificate is dated 12th April 2011. The Director of Children’s Services prepared a report which is on record. The guardian ad litem, D H K, prepared a report which has been filed in court. All the reports are favourable and recommend that the court allows the applicants to adopt the child. I have evaluated the facts of this adoption. This is a local adoption. It is evident that the applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements pertaining to the adoption of the child. The consent of the biological mother has been obtained on 7th February 2011. This court is satisfied that the applicants are qualified and able to take care of the child. The home visits by the guardian ad litem, the Adoption Society and the Director of the Children Services established that the applicants have the financial capability to provide for the upkeep and education of the child. This court observed the applicants with the child in court. It was evident that in the period that the applicants have had the custody of the child, the child has bonded well with them. The child considers the applicants her parents.
This court formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants. I allow the applicants’ application for adoption. The applicants, E W R and L B K, are hereby allowed to adopt Baby J. Henceforth, the child shall be known as S I N R. Her date of birth shall be 26th December 2010. Her place of birth shall be Wholistic Caring & Counselling Centre, Nairobi –Kenya. S K R and E A A, brother and sister in law of the 1st Applicant shall be the legal guardians of the child should such eventuality arise. I direct the Registrar General to enter this order in the adoption register. I hereby discharge the guardian ad litem from exercising that role. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014
L. KIMARU
JUDGE