[2015] KEHC 2216 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 2216 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law and the Hague Convention. Despite the Director of Children Services not filing a report due to a Cabinet moratorium on foreign adoptions, the Kenya National Adoption Committee had approved the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 2216 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: E G S; Applicant: A-K S; Respondent: Baby M B
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 131 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
LA Achode
Legal Topics
International Adoption, Child Welfare, Best Interest of Child
Source Language
en
Family and Children International Adoption Child Welfare Best Interest of Child

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

E G S

Applicant

A-K S

Applicant

Baby M B

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Applicants meet the legal requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interest of the child.
  3. 3 Whether the absence of a report from the Director of Children Services invalidates the proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law and the Hague Convention. Despite the Director of Children Services not filing a report due to a Cabinet moratorium on foreign adoptions, the Kenya National Adoption Committee had approved the Applicants, and the court was satisfied with the reports from the Adoption Society and guardian ad litem. The court held that the best interest of the child was served by granting the adoption, as the Applicants were found to be suitable, the child had bonded with them, and all procedural safeguards had been met or properly dispensed with. The court exercised its discretion to waive...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The Applicants, E G S and A-K S, are allowed to adopt Baby M B, who shall be known as M B J S.
  • The child's date of birth is presumed to be 2nd December, 2011.