[2017] KEHC 3385 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 3385 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicants had fulfilled all legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned at birth, and no biological relatives could be traced, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. Statutory reports from the adoption society, guardians ad litem, and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 3385 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: A M M N; Applicant: G K K; Respondent: C N N; Respondent: S K
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 253 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Responsibility
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Child Welfare Parental Responsibility

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A M M N

Applicant

G K K

Applicant

C N N

Respondent

S K

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interest of the child.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of the biological parents can be dispensed with due to abandonment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicants had fulfilled all legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned at birth, and no biological relatives could be traced, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. Statutory reports from the adoption society, guardians ad litem, and the Director of Children Services all confirmed the Applicants' suitability and the positive bonding between the Applicants and the child. The court determined that the adoption was in the best interest of the child, who had been in the Applicants' continuous care and considered them her parents. Accordingly, the court granted the adoption, changing the child's name and appointing...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The Applicants, A M M N and G K K, are authorized to adopt BABY C W, who shall henceforth be known as E J M.
  • C N N and S K are appointed as legal guardians of the child in case of any eventuality.