[2015] KEHC 3547 (KLR)
The court found that the evidence presented in the affidavits of the applicant and Johnson Kuria Mungai established that Eliud Mungai Mbure disappeared in 2006 and has not been heard from by any person who would be expected to have heard from him if he were alive. As more than seven years have elapsed since his...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 3547 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lucy Mugure Muigai
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 20 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- Application granted. Presumption of death made under section 118A of the Evidence Act. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Presumption of Death, Missing Persons, Evidence Act Section 118a
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lucy Mugure Muigai
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should presume Eliud Mungai Mbure dead under section 118A of the Evidence Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the evidence presented in the affidavits of the applicant and Johnson Kuria Mungai established that Eliud Mungai Mbure disappeared in 2006 and has not been heard from by any person who would be expected to have heard from him if he were alive. As more than seven years have elapsed since his disappearance, the statutory requirements under section 118A of the Evidence Act were met. The court was satisfied that the presumption of death should be made in accordance with the law.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Presumption of death made under section 118A of the Evidence Act. No order as to costs.
Orders
- Prayer 1 of the notice of motion dated 22nd May 2014 is granted. Eliud Mungai Mbure is presumed dead under section 118A of the Evidence Act. No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A
MISC APPLICATION NO 20 OF 2014
IN THE MATTER OF ELIUD MUNGAI MBURE
AND
IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 118A OF THE EVIDENCE ACT, CAP 80
LUCY MUGURE MUIGAI………APPLICANT
R U L I N G
1. The subject of this ruling is one Eliud Mungai Mbure (Mungai) who is said to have disappeared in the year 2006 without trace. The Applicant Lucy Mugure Muigai (Mugure) has applied for an order under section 118A of the Evidence Act, Cap 80 to presume Mungai to be dead.
2. In her supporting affidavit Mugure states, inter alia,that she is a daughter-in-law of Mungai; that Mungai was of sound mind when he left home in Ndunyu-Chege Location in the year 2006; that he never came back; that his wife, Beatrice Watiri Mungai (now deceased) and other relatives reported his disappearance to Ol-Moran Police Station; that the police were unable to trace him; and that since his disappearance he has not been seen or heard of by any family member, or any other person who would be expected to have seen or heard of him.
3. There is further supporting affidavit sworn by one Johnson Kuria Mungai (Kuria) filed on 14/07/2015. Kuria has stated, inter alia, that he is a son of Mungai; and that his father has not been seen or heard of by anyone who would ordinarily be expected to have seen or heard of him since he disappeared in the year 2006.
4. Section 118A of the Evidence Act provides –
“118A. Where it is proved that a person has not been heard of for seven years by those who might be expected to have heard of him if he were alive, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that he is dead”.
In the present case I am satisfied upon the evidence placed before the court in the two affidavits sworn in support of the application, that Eliud Mungai Mbure disappeared from his home in the year 2006, and that since that time (a period of well over seven (7) years) he has not been heard of by those who might be expected to have heard of him if he were alive. It is therefore presumed that he is dead.
5. In the event I will grant prayer 1 of the notice of motion dated 22nd May 2014 with no order as to costs. It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AT MURANG’A THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY 2015
H P G WAWERU
JUDGE
DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY 2015