[2014] KEHC 7244 (KLR)
The court found that the previous administrator was no longer capable of acting as such, as evidenced by her conduct and the arguments presented in the earlier application. The transfers of estate property were effected without the involvement of all beneficiaries and while the revocation application was pending,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 7244 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mary Wairimu Gatibaru; Applicant: Jacinta Muthoni Kimotho; Respondent: Margaret Wanjiru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 2350 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Cancellation of Titles and Injunctive Orders
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estates, Revocation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Appointment of Administrators
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Wairimu Gatibaru
Applicant
Jacinta Muthoni Kimotho
Applicant
Margaret Wanjiru
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Cancellation of Titles and Injunctive Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the previous administrator failed or refused to release relevant documents to the new administrators.
- 2 Whether the transfers of estate property by the previous administrator were valid and involved all beneficiaries.
- 3 Whether the new administrators are entitled to cancellation of titles and injunctive relief.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the previous administrator was no longer capable of acting as such, as evidenced by her conduct and the arguments presented in the earlier application. The transfers of estate property were effected without the involvement of all beneficiaries and while the revocation application was pending, undermining the proper administration of the estate. The court determined that the new administrators had established a sufficient basis for the cancellation of the titles and injunctive relief to ensure a clear and lawful administration of the estate moving forward.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The application dated 3rd April 2013 is allowed.
- Titles transferred by the previous administrator are cancelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 2350 OF 2007
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JORAM GATIBARU MARARO – (DECEASED)
RULING
1. On 5th February 2013 Kimaru J revoked the grant made on 8th October 2008 to Margaret Wanjiru and appointed Mary Wairimu Gatibaru and Jacinta Muthoni Kimotho the new administrators of the estate.
2. On 3rd April 2013 the new administrators filed an application dated the same day, seeking revocation of various titles registered in the names of the previous administrator and other persons and injunctive orders to restrain pending trustees.
3. These case is that the previous administrator has failed and or refused to release all the relevant documents to them indeed, while the revocation application was pending, the previous administrator moved to make the transfer complained about. The said transfers were done without involvement of the other beneficiaries.
4. Upon served, the previous administrator swore an affidavit on 10th April 2013. She denies refusing to surrender documents to the said administrators, instead she says that when she sought to retrieve the documents from the relevant land registries she discovered that the transfer had been effected and new titles had been or were in the process of being issued. She asserts that the beneficiaries had consented and agreed on the mode of distribution.
5. I have noted that there was an application dated 18th September 2012 which sought cancellation of the titles obtained in respect of land and transfer of shares. The primary argument was that the administrator was very old and no longer able to carry out the duties of administrator. That application was argued before Njagi J on 10th October 2012. The orders made by Kimaru J. on 5th February 2013 were founded on the said application. By revoking the grant the court accepted the argument that the premises administrator was no longer capable to act as such, and it is my view that this decision was founded on the previous conduct of the said administrator, which conduct provided the background for the prayer for the cancellation of the transfer of the titles and shares. I persuaded that the order for cancellation ought to have background to give the new administrators a clear state upon which to work.
6. I find merit in the case advanced by the new administrators in their application dated 3rd April 2013. I do hereby allow the said application. There will be no order as to costs.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this31st DAY OF January, 2014.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE