[2018] KEHC 9836 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act. Despite the moratorium on international adoptions, the 2nd applicant's long-term domicile in Kenya, marriage to a Kenyan citizen, and intention to remain in Kenya distinguished this case from typical...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 9836 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: KRP; Applicant: CLKP
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 119 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- AO Muchelule, A Ali-Aroni
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, International Adoption Moratorium
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KRP
Applicant
CLKP
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act.
- 2 Whether the moratorium on international adoptions bars the present application given the 2nd applicant's citizenship.
- 3 Whether dispensing with the biological parents' consent is justified due to abandonment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act. Despite the moratorium on international adoptions, the 2nd applicant's long-term domicile in Kenya, marriage to a Kenyan citizen, and intention to remain in Kenya distinguished this case from typical international adoptions. The child had been abandoned, and efforts to trace biological relatives were unsuccessful, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. The applicants demonstrated their ability to provide a stable and nurturing environment, and the adoption was deemed to be in the best interests of the child. The court exercised its discretion to allow the...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants KRP and CLKP are allowed to adopt Child OO.
- Child OO shall henceforth be known as OOKP.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 119 OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF CHILD OO
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION BY
KRP..........................................................1ST APPLICANT
CLKP......................................................2ND APPLICANT
JUDGMENT
1. The applicants are a couple aged 45 and 48, respectively. The first applicant is a Kenyan citizen while the 2nd applicant is a Canadian citizen who is domiciled in Kenya, having lived in Kenya for the last sixteen years. The 1st applicant is a director [particulars withheld] Limited while the second applicant is a house wife. They got married on 4th May 2003 and three children, one biological child (born in 2006) and two other children adopted on 8th June 2010 and 2nd May 2017. They filed the originating summons on 25th August 2017 seeking to be allowed to adopt the male child.
2. Child OO was on born on 27th October 2012 according to the birth certificate serial number [Particulars withheld] issued at Kiambu District. According to the police letter dated 3rd December 2013, the child was found abandoned in a street within Kiambu County by a good Samaritan named James Wamati. The case was recorded vide O.B No.[Particulars withheld]. He was taken to Kiambu Children Office on 23rd October 2015 and referred to Jean Petty Legacy Home on the same day for safe custody. The child was formally committed to the care of Jean Petty Legacy Home on 26th January 2016 by the Children’s Court in Kiambu vide Protection and Care Cause No.2 of 2016. The final police letter by Kiambu Police Station dated 31st August 2016 stated that investigations to trace the whereabouts of the parents or relatives had been fruitless. The child was declared free for adoption under section 156(1) of the Children’s Actby Change Trust Adoption Services on 28th February 2017 and was placed under the care of the applicants for mandatory bonding prior to adoption. He has been under the continuous care of the applicants since 6th April 2017.
3. The court on 8th February 2018 appointed G K M as guardian ad litem and ordered that he files a report after carrying out a social inquiry on the applicants. A similar report was sought from the Director of Children Services. Both reports were duly filed, and each recommended that the applicants be allowed to adopt the child. The reports found that the applicants were socially, emotionally and financially stable and suitable to adopt the child. It was also found that the child and the applicants had bonded well. The Director of Children Services’ report, however, pointed out that there was a moratorium in place prohibiting international adoptions and since the 2nd applicant was a Canadian citizen the report left the matter to the discretion of the court to make a ruling that was in the best interests of the child.
4. Although the 2nd applicant is a Canadian citizen, it is noted that she is married to a Kenyan citizen and has been staying in Kenya for the last sixteen years. The court further notes her explanation that she has no intention of leaving Kenya. She and her husband have other children. Both adoptions were cleared by the Director of Children Services. The latter adoption was when the moratorium was in place.
5. The court finds that it is in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants. The applicants have demonstrated their ability to provide a conducive home and family environment in which the child will grow and develop. They will assume all parental rights and obligations of the biological parents of the child once adopted, and shall treat her as if she was borne of them. They have been made aware that once the adoption order is made, it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child. The child shall have the right to inherit their property. The applicants shall not be able to give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child. This court dispenses with the consent of the child’s biological parents as the child was found abandoned.
6. Having been satisfied that all the legal requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act have been met, the following orders shall issue:-
a) the applicants KRP and CLKP are hereby allowed to adopt Child OO;
b) child OO shall henceforth be known as OOKP;
c) the child’s date of birth shall be 27th October 2012, and shall be presumed Kenyan by birth having been born at Kiambu in Kenya;
d) BP and SS are hereby appointed to be the child’s legal guardians in the event of death or incapacity of the applicants before he is of full age and fully self-reliant;
e) the Registrar-General is directed to enter this adoption in the Adopted Children Register;
f) the Director of Immigration is directed to issue the child with a Kenyan passport; and
g) the guardian ad litem is hereby discharged.
DATED and SIGNED at NAIROBI this 27TH day of NOVEMBER 2018.
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE
DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 29TH NOVEMBER 2018.
ALI-ARONI
JUDGE