[2020] KEHC 9360 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001, including obtaining the valid consent of the biological mother, the child being declared free for adoption, and the applicants being found suitable by both the guardian ad litem and the Director of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 9360 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: NMM; Applicant: MWW
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 35 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- AO Muchelule, AN Ongeri
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Rights, Consent to Adoption
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NMM
Applicant
MWW
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether the consent of the biological mother was valid and sufficient.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001, including obtaining the valid consent of the biological mother, the child being declared free for adoption, and the applicants being found suitable by both the guardian ad litem and the Director of Children Services. The court determined that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, as the applicants could provide a stable and loving home, and the child had bonded well with them. The court emphasized that the adoption order would confer all parental rights and obligations on the applicants, and the child would have the right to inherit their property. The...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants NMM and MWW are allowed to adopt Baby P.
- Baby P. shall henceforth be known as MMM.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 35 OF 2012(OS)
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY P.
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION BY
NMM............................................1ST APPLICANT
MWW..........................................2ND APPLICANT
JUDGMENT
1. The applicants NMM and MWW are a Kenyan couple aged 38 and 46, respectively. They do business. They solemnized their marriage on 12th July 2018 at the Attorney General Chambers in Nairobi. They have one child. On 25th March 2019 they filed this originating summons dated 23rd January 2019 seeking to adopt Baby P.
2. Baby P. was born on 31st March 2018 to one TWN as indicated in birth certificate serial number [….]. The child was offered for adoption by the mother who signed her consent on 3rd August 2018. The mother offered the child because this was unplanned pregnancy and she had four previous children to take care of. The child was committed to Thomas Barnardo Children Home for care and protection pursuant to an order made by the Nairobi Children’s Court in Protection and Care Case No. 178/2018. The child was declared free for adoption by Kenya Children’s Home Adoption Society on 15th August 2018. It had been confirmed that there was no relative willing to take up the child. On 20th August 2018 the child as placed with the applicants for bonding.
3. On 9th May 2019 the court appointed CMK as the guardian ad litem to the child and ordered her and the Director of Children Services to within 45 days prepare and file the requisite reports after carrying out a social inquiry on the applicants to determine their suitability to adopt the child. The two reports were filed each recommending the applicants to be allowed to adopt the child. The reports found that the applicants were socially, emotionally and financially stable and suitable to adopt the child. It was also found that the child and the applicants had bonded well.
4. The court finds that it is in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants. The applicants have demonstrated their ability to provide a conducive home and family environment in which the child will grow and develop. They will assume all parental rights and obligations of the biological parents of the child once adopted, and shall treat her as if she was born to them. They have been made aware that once the adoption order is made, it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child. The child shall have the right to inherit their property. The applicants shall not be able to give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child. This court considers that the child’s biological mother willingly gave her up for adoption.
5. Having been satisfied that all the legal requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act have been met, the following orders shall issue:-
a) the applicants NMM and MWW are hereby allowed to adopt Baby P.;
b) Baby P. shall henceforth be known as MMM;
c) the child shall be presumed to be Kenyan having been born to a Kenyan woman in Kenya;
d) MWW is hereby appointed to be the child’s legal guardian in the event of death or incapacity of the applicants before she is of full age and fully self-reliant;
e) the Registrar-General is directed to enter this adoption in the Adopted Children Register; and
f) the guardian ad litem is hereby discharged.
DATED and SIGNED at NAIROBI this 6TH FEBRUARY 2020
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE
DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 13TH FEBRUARY 2020
A.N. ONGERI
JUDGE