[2025] KEHC 6082 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 6082 (KLR)

The court held that the power to rectify a grant under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43 of the Probate and Administration Rules is limited to correcting errors relating to names, descriptions, or the time and place of the deceased's death. The substantive changes sought by the applicant—including...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 6082 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Anthony Mwangi Kiiru; Respondent: Rosemary Wanjiku Mwangi (deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 118 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
application struck out
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Administration of Estates, Succession Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Administration of Estates Succession Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Mwangi Kiiru

Applicant

Rosemary Wanjiku Mwangi (deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the proposed changes to the grant, including removal of a deceased administrator, inclusion of new assets, and transfer of assets to beneficiaries, can be effected through rectification under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43 of the Probate and Administration Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the application for rectification is merited in light of the substantive nature of the changes sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the power to rectify a grant under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43 of the Probate and Administration Rules is limited to correcting errors relating to names, descriptions, or the time and place of the deceased's death. The substantive changes sought by the applicant—including removal of a deceased administrator, inclusion of new assets, and absolute transfer of property to beneficiaries—go beyond the scope of rectification and should be pursued through an application for review of the certificate of confirmation of grant. As such, the summons for rectification was found to be without merit and was struck out.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • Summons for Rectification of Grant dated 25th February, 2025 is struck out.
  • Costs to be in the cause.