[2023] KEHC 24078 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants, as close family members, had not seen or heard from John Muriithi Maina since October 2006, a period exceeding seventeen years. The applicants provided credible and reliable evidence, including police reports and sworn affidavits, demonstrating exhaustive but unsuccessful efforts...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 24078 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Rosebell Wakiuru Maina; Applicant: Hilda Wambui Maina; Applicant: Hudson Waimiri
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E379 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- JN Mulwa
- Legal Topics
- Presumption of Death, Missing Persons, Evidence Act Section 118a
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rosebell Wakiuru Maina
Applicant
Hilda Wambui Maina
Applicant
Hudson Waimiri
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient evidence to warrant a presumption of death for John Muriithi Maina under Section 118A of the Evidence Act.
- 2 Whether the issuance of a death certificate is justified based on the circumstances presented.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, as close family members, had not seen or heard from John Muriithi Maina since October 2006, a period exceeding seventeen years. The applicants provided credible and reliable evidence, including police reports and sworn affidavits, demonstrating exhaustive but unsuccessful efforts to trace his whereabouts. The court applied Section 118A of the Evidence Act, which establishes a rebuttable presumption of death where a person has not been heard from for seven years by those who would ordinarily be expected to hear from him if alive. The court was satisfied that the statutory threshold was met and that it was just to grant the orders sought, including the...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- John Muriithi Maina is presumed dead under Section 118A of the Evidence Act.
- The Registrar of Births and Deaths is directed to issue a death certificate for John Muriithi Maina.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
In re Presumption of Death of John Muriithi Maina (Miscellaneous Civil Application E379 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 24078 (KLR) (Civ) (26 October 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 24078 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Civil
Miscellaneous Civil Application E379 of 2023
JN Mulwa, J
October 26, 2023
In the matter of an Application for Presumption of death of JOHN MURIITHI MAINA
In the matter of
Rosebell Wakiuru Maina
1st Applicant
Hilda Wambui Maina
2nd Applicant
Hudson Waimiri
3rd Applicant
Ruling
1. Before the court for determination is the Notice of Motion dated May 30, 2023. The applicants being mother and sister to the subject seek that John Muriithi Maina be presumed dead and a death certificate be issued to that effect by the Registrar of Births and Deaths.
2. The Application is anchored on Section 118A of the Evidence Act, Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 50 Rule (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules and all other enabling provisions of the law. It is supported by a supporting affidavit sworn by the Applicants Ms. Rosebell Wakiuru Maina, Ms. Hilda Wambui Maina and Mr. Hudson Waimiri all dated May 31, 2023.
3. I have considered the depositions made by the Applicants in the affidavits on record as well as the information contained in the annexures thereto.
4. The 1st Applicant contends that she is the mother of Mr. John Muriithi Maina (the subject) and that he was 24 years old at the time he went missing and was studying at Ashleys College Nairobi.. Iwas her averments that the last time she spoke with the subject was on October 20, 2006.
5. The 1st Applicant averred that the father had informed her that the subject had left with friends the day she had contacted him, and that he had left again early the following day with two more friends. Since then, he had not returned, nor heard from him as his mobile phone unanswered for the whole week. She stated that she searched for him at his former place of study, Kenyatta National Hospital, but was unable to locate him after which she reported his disappearance to Kiamumbi Police Station and was given an OB, which was issued on March 11, 2023, which was given to his father, Patrick Maina John (Deceased), who passed away on October 10, 2019.
6. The 1st Applicant stated that the father of the subject, the Late Patrick Maina John designated his missing son as a beneficiary in his pension plan, and in order for her to get the money, a death certificate is required.
7. The 2nd Applicant stated that her brother was reported missing sometime in December 2006, when she returned home from Uganda, where she was doing her final A-level exams, and learned that he had not been seen or heard from since October.
8. The 3rd Applicant stated that the missing person was his brother, and he went missing sometime in October 2006. He was still in high school when he returned home from school during the midterm break, and when school ended in December 2006, he met with the missing person's friends, who informed him that they had not seen or heard from him.
9. I have considered the application, the two affidavits on record and the annexures thereto. The law governing the circumstances in which a person may be presumed dead is set out in Section 118A of the Evidence Act which states as follows:“Where it is proved that a person has not been heard of for seven years by those who might be expected to have heard of him if he were alive, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that he is dead.”
10. In this case, the Applicants who are the subject’s mother and his siblings namely Hilda Wambui Maina and Hudson Waimiri Maina who are people who are expected to see or hear from the subject almost on a daily basis or every so often have confirmed that they have not heard or seen the subject since October, 2006. I have confirmed from annexures to the affidavits filed by the Applicants that she went with the company of his aunty in search of him in Kamukunji and Central Police Stations as well. I have also confirmed that the subject’s disappearance was reported to Kiamumbi Police Station by his late father Patrick Maina John who was in custody of the OB.
11. In view of the foregoing, I am satisfied that the Applicant has demonstrated by credible and reliable evidence that the subject disappeared on or about 20th October 2006 and has to date not been seen or in touch with his close family members. This means that the subject has been missing for the last about 17 years and all efforts to trace his whereabouts have been unsuccessful. If the subject was alive, it is expected that he would have attempted to contact at least some members of his nuclear family which he has not done to date.
12. Flowing from the above, it is my finding that the applicant has met the threshold set in Section 118A of the Evidence Act by providing evidence which raises a presumption that the subject is dead.
13. For the foregoing reasons, I find that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the applicants the orders sought in view of the circumstances necessitating filing of the motion. I therefore invoke the inherent powers of this court under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and allow the application with no orders as to costs.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN NAIROBI THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023. JANET MULWAJUDGE