[2006] KEHC 750 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 750 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, as a creditor, was aggrieved by the striking off of Queensway Investments Limited, which owed a substantial unsatisfied judgment debt. The petition was filed within the statutory ten-year period following publication of the striking off in the Kenya Gazette. The court noted that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] KEHC 750 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Malindi Air Services Limited; Respondent: Queensway Investments Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 6 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Outcome
petition allowed
Legal Topics
Company Restoration, Striking Off Register, Creditor Rights
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Company Restoration Striking Off Register Creditor Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Malindi Air Services Limited

Applicant

Queensway Investments Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Queensway Investments Limited should be restored to the register of companies after being struck off.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant, as a creditor, is entitled to seek restoration under Section 339(6) of the Companies Act.
  3. 3 Whether the petition was filed within the statutory time limit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, as a creditor, was aggrieved by the striking off of Queensway Investments Limited, which owed a substantial unsatisfied judgment debt. The petition was filed within the statutory ten-year period following publication of the striking off in the Kenya Gazette. The court noted that even if the company was not carrying on business at the time of striking off, there was a pending application for examination of its directors and accounts, which could have assisted in execution of the decree. The court concluded that it was just and equitable to restore the company to the register to allow the creditor to pursue satisfaction of its judgment.

Court Disposition

petition allowed

Orders

  • Queensway Investments Limited is restored to the register of Companies.
  • Costs of the petition are awarded to the petitioner.