[2013] KEHC 1220 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned at birth and the biological parents could not be traced, making it lawful to dispense with their consent. Reports from the Adoption Society, Director of Children’s Services,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 1220 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: E O M; Applicant: E E O
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 42 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Abandoned Children
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E O M
Applicant
E E O
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether it is in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants.
- 3 Whether the consent of the biological parents can be dispensed with due to abandonment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned at birth and the biological parents could not be traced, making it lawful to dispense with their consent. Reports from the Adoption Society, Director of Children’s Services, and guardian ad litem were all favorable, confirming the applicants' suitability and the child’s positive adjustment and bonding with them. The court determined that adoption by the applicants was in the best interest of the child, who would benefit from a stable, loving family environment. Accordingly, the court granted the adoption, ordered the child’s name to be changed,...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants E O M and E E O are allowed to adopt Baby R, now to be known as Z O M.
- The child’s date of birth is declared as 20th October 2010 and place of birth as Nairobi, Kenya.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO.42 OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY R aka Z O M- MINOR
E O M
E E O….……………………......………… APPLICANTS
J U D G M E N T
The applicants E O M and E E O, are husband and wife. They were married on 6th December 2003. The 1st applicant is a telecommunication engineer while the 2nd applicant is an IT professional cum administrator. The Applicants have not been blessed with biological children of their own due to medical reasons. They wish to adopt a child. They have applied to this court to be allowed to adopt baby Z O M (the child). The child was on found abandoned at Kamukunji Police Station canteen. At the time, it was presumed that the child was one day old, his date of birth being 20th October 2010. A report was made on the same day to Kamukunji Police Station. The child was placed with Missionaries of Charity Huruma Children’s Home for care and protection. She was committed by the Nairobi Children’s Court to the custody of the said Children’s Home on 27th May 2011 pending formal adoption proceedings. The Applicants were given custody of the child for mandatory foster care pending adoption pursuant to a foster care agreement which was signed on 9th July 2011. They took custody of the child on the same day. Since then, the child has been in the continuous custody and care of the applicants.
Prior to the hearing of the adoption, the Adoption Society, KKPI, prepared a report which is filed in court. They also issued a certificate declaring the child free for adoption. The certificate is dated 29th June 2011. The Director of Children’s Services prepared a report which is on record. The guardian ad litem, B A O, prepared a report which has been filed in court. All the reports are favourable and recommend that the court allows the applicants to adopt the child. I have evaluated the facts of this adoption. This is a local adoption. It is evident that the applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements pertaining to the adoption of the child. The consent of the biological parents of the child was dispensed with since the child was abandoned at birth. They cannot be traced to give their consent. This court is satisfied that the applicants are qualified and able to take care of the child. The home visits by the guardian ad litem, the Adoption Society and the Director of the Children Services established that the applicants have the financial capability to provide for the upkeep and education of the child. This court observed that the applicants with the child in court. It was evident that in the period that the applicants have had the custody of the child, the child has bonded well with them. The child considers the applicants his parents.
This court formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants. I allow the applicants’ application for adoption. The applicants, E O M and E E O, are hereby allowed to adopt Baby R. Henceforth, the child shall be known as Z O M. His date of birth shall be 20th October 2010. His place of birth shall be Nairobi Kenya. L M K and S L, family friends of the applicants, shall be the legal guardian of the child should such eventuality arise. I direct the Registrar General to enter this order in the adoption register. I hereby discharge the guardian ad litem. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2013
L. KIMARU
JUDGE