[2017] KEELC 440 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 440 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants failed to provide the trust document or any evidence specifying the proportions of entitlement to LR No. Loc.10/Kahuti/387. The title was silent on the proportions, and the absence of a trust instrument made it impossible for the court to determine the appropriate shares or to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 440 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Francis Waithaka; Applicant: Serah Wambui; Respondent: Maina Waithaka (deceased)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Muranga
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 41 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Originating Summons
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
BC Koech
Legal Topics
Trusts in Land, Vesting Orders, Title Registration, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Trusts in Land Vesting Orders Title Registration Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Waithaka

Applicant

Serah Wambui

Applicant

Maina Waithaka (deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Originating Summons

  1. 1 Whether the trust in favour of the applicants over LR No. Loc.10/Kahuti/387 should be dissolved and the land vested in their names as proprietors in specified proportions.
  2. 2 Whether sufficient evidence was provided to support the vesting order sought by the applicants.
  3. 3 Whether the court can grant a vesting order in the absence of a trust document specifying the proportions of entitlement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to provide the trust document or any evidence specifying the proportions of entitlement to LR No. Loc.10/Kahuti/387. The title was silent on the proportions, and the absence of a trust instrument made it impossible for the court to determine the appropriate shares or to grant a vesting order as prayed. Furthermore, there was a prior court order maintaining status quo pending determination of Civil Case No. 350/96, and no evidence was provided as to the outcome of that case. The court held that, in the absence of cogent evidence and in light of the existing status quo order, it could not abrogate rights in land or grant the orders sought. The...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.