[2016] KEHC 3839 (KLR)
The court found that the Applicants fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was lawfully declared abandoned, committed to a care institution, and subsequently declared free for adoption. The Applicants demonstrated financial, emotional, and social capacity to care...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 3839 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: S M M; Applicant: C W K; Respondent: Director of Children’s Services
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 232 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- LA Achode
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Rights, Child Abandonment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S M M
Applicant
C W K
Applicant
Director of Children’s Services
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by Article 53(2) of the Constitution.
- 3 Whether proper procedures regarding abandonment and consent have been followed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Applicants fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was lawfully declared abandoned, committed to a care institution, and subsequently declared free for adoption. The Applicants demonstrated financial, emotional, and social capacity to care for the child, and all relevant reports from the Adoption Society, guardian ad litem, and Director of Children’s Services were favorable. The court emphasized that the best interests of the child, as mandated by Article 53(2) of the Constitution, would be served by granting the adoption. The court concluded that the adoption would provide the child with a stable family...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The Applicants, S M M and C W K, are allowed to adopt baby R M, who shall henceforth be known as M M M.
- The child’s date of birth is presumed to be 23rd February, 2014, and place of birth is Gatundu sub county, Kiambu County.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 232 OF 2015 (OS)
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT NO. 8 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF BABY R M
BY
S M M AND C W K (APPLICANTS)
JUDGMENT
1. The Applicants S M M and C W K are in a monogamous marriage which was solemnized at St. Catherine Siena Catholic Church, in Nairobi in September, 2009. They have no child of their own. They wish to adopt the child known as Baby R M a minor of male sex, through the Originating Summons dated 14th September, 2015. They indicate that S M M is a Pilot with [Particulars Withheld] while C W K is a self-employed Consultant. They reside in Lavington and are both Christians.
2. Records indicate that on 24th February, 2014, the child who is the subject of this adoption proceedings was found abandoned at Gatitu Secondary School compound in Gatundu Sub County. The report was booked via OB No. 03/24/02/2014 at the Gatundu Police Station. The child was taken to Gatundu Level IV hospital for medical check-up where he was admitted at the New Born Unit.
3. On 12th August, 2014 the child was referred to New Life Home Trust, for care and protection. On 12th August 2014, the child was officially committed to the same home by the Resident Magistrate at Gatundu court vide P&C Case No. 3/2014. A Letter dated 27th August, 2014 from Gatundu Police Station indicates that the biological parents of the child were not traced, nor did anyone come forward to claim the child.
4. The child was declared free for adoption on 29th October, 2014 by the Kenyans to Kenyans Peace Initiative Adoption Society, vide certificate No. 494. He was released into the custody of the Applicants for mandatory foster care pending adoption on 9th January, 2015. The Applicants also signed a Foster Care Agreement dated the same day. Since then he has been in the continuous custody and care of the Applicants. Prior to the hearing of the adoption application, Kenya Children’s Home Adoption Society, an adoption society, prepared and filed a report in court.
5. The Adoption Society, guardian ad litem and the Director of Children’s Services have all made home visits and established that the Applicants are financially and emotionally capable of providing for the up keep and education of the child.
6. The Director of Children’s Services also filed a report dated 13th April, 2016 recommending the adoption for reasons that the child stands to gain the opportunities provided by becoming the son of the Applicants and growing up in a home rather than growing up in an institution. The guardian ad litem, I K also filed a report that was favourable and recommended the adoption of the child by the Applicants.
7. The child was in court during the hearing and appeared to have bonded well with the Applicants. He was jovial and related well with the Applicants. Both Applicants’ families support the adoption.
8. More importantly, the orders sought by the Applicants relate to a child. In law, in any matter concerning a child, the best interests of a child are paramount. Article 53(2)of theConstitution provides the guiding principle on this question as follows:
“A child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child.”
The other pertinent law is the Children Act No. 8of 2001 and in particular Section 4(3) thereof.
9. From the foregoing, this court has formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the Applicants. Reasons wherefore I allow the prayers sought in the Originating Summons dated 14th September, 2015 and order as follows:
i. The Applicants, S M M and C W K are hereby allowed to adopt baby R M who shall henceforth be known as M M M.
ii. His date of birth shall be presumed to be 23rd February, 2014. He is presumed to have been born in Kenya in accordance with Article 14 (3)of theConstitution, and the place of birth shall be Gatundu sub county of Kiambu County.
iii. J M and J M (Male Applicant’s parents) respectively are hereby appointed legal guardians of the child in the event that the Applicants die or are incapacitated by ill-health.
iv. I direct the Registrar General to enter this order in the Adoption Register.
v. The Director of Immigration is hereby authorised to issue the child with a Kenyan passport.
vi. The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
SIGNED DATEDandDELIVEREDin open court this 24th day of June 2016.
L. A. ACHODE
JUDGE