[2025] KEHC 1788 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 1788 (KLR)

The court found that the subject is incapable of managing her own affairs and that her property is registered in her name. The applicant, as a joint guardian, sought to utilize the property through temporary periodic farming leases to generate income for the subject's care and daily needs. The application was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 1788 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: AWC; Respondent: DMM
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E042 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Orders Under the Mental Health Act
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
SM Mohochi
Legal Topics
Mental Capacity, Guardianship, Management of Property, Best Interests, Court Supervision
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Mental Capacity Guardianship Management of Property Best Interests Court Supervision

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AWC

Applicant

DMM

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Orders Under the Mental Health Act

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be permitted to enter into temporary periodic farming leases over the subject's property to raise funds for the subject's care.
  2. 2 Whether the court should compel the respondent to cooperate in the execution of such leases for the benefit of the subject.
  3. 3 How the property of a person under mental incapacity should be managed in the best interests of the subject.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the subject is incapable of managing her own affairs and that her property is registered in her name. The applicant, as a joint guardian, sought to utilize the property through temporary periodic farming leases to generate income for the subject's care and daily needs. The application was unopposed, and the court was satisfied that the proposed leases would not prejudice the subject's interests and were necessary to ensure her welfare. The court held that the property should be used to meet the subject's needs, that both joint guardians must cooperate in executing the leases, and that they are to account for all monies collected and utilized. The orders were made in...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is permitted to enter into temporary periodic farming leases with third party lessees in respect to parcel Bahati/Bahati Block x/1384 to raise finances for the subject's care and needs.
  • All subleases created shall be executed by both joint guardians.