[2023] KEHC 2206 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 2206 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, AWM, satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children's Act 2022. The child, S, was abandoned as an infant and declared free for adoption by a registered agency. Police efforts to trace the biological family were unsuccessful, justifying waiver of parental...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 2206 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: JMM; Applicant: AWM; Respondent: HWG
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 53 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
MA Odero
Legal Topics
Adoption of Children, Best Interests of Child, Abandoned Children, Waiver of Consent
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption of Children Best Interests of Child Abandoned Children Waiver of Consent

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JMM

Applicant

AWM

Applicant

HWG

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant meets the legal requirements to adopt the child.
  2. 2 Whether the best interests of the child will be served by the adoption.
  3. 3 Whether the requirement for parental consent can be waived due to abandonment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, AWM, satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children's Act 2022. The child, S, was abandoned as an infant and declared free for adoption by a registered agency. Police efforts to trace the biological family were unsuccessful, justifying waiver of parental consent. The applicant demonstrated financial stability, good health, and a supportive family environment. The child had lived with the applicant for nearly ten years, had bonded with her, and expressed a desire to remain in her care. All professional reports supported the adoption. The court concluded that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, providing him with...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant AWM is authorized to adopt the child known as BABY S.
  • Upon adoption, the child shall be known as SPMM.