[2015] KEHC 5556 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 5556 (KLR)

The court found that two of the original administrators had died, and the applicants had provided sufficient evidence, including death certificates and consents from all beneficiaries, to justify rectification of the grant. There was no opposition to the application, and the beneficiaries had agreed to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 5556 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Ruchiri Githinji; Applicant: Joseph Kibiku Githinji; Applicant: Henry Kamau Githinji; Applicant: Paul Kibiku Githinji; Respondent: Francis Kariba Githinji; Respondent: Moses Waithaka Kariba; Respondent: Shadrack Githinji Kariba; Respondent: Gracn Wambua Kariba; Respondent: Virginia Wachuka Githinji; Respondent: Fredrick Gathungu Meta; Respondent: Faith Waithira Githinji
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2795 of 1995
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
application for rectification of grant allowed
Judges
REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Succession, Rectification of Grant, Administration of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Rectification of Grant Administration of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Ruchiri Githinji

Applicant

Joseph Kibiku Githinji

Applicant

Henry Kamau Githinji

Applicant

Paul Kibiku Githinji

Applicant

Francis Kariba Githinji

Respondent

Moses Waithaka Kariba

Respondent

Shadrack Githinji Kariba

Respondent

Gracn Wambua Kariba

Respondent

Virginia Wachuka Githinji

Respondent

Fredrick Gathungu Meta

Respondent

Faith Waithira Githinji

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration should be rectified and reissued to the surviving administrators.
  2. 2 Whether the remaining administrators should be allowed to complete the distribution of the estate.
  3. 3 Whether the redistribution of the estate should be as per the affidavit dated 30/7/14.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that two of the original administrators had died, and the applicants had provided sufficient evidence, including death certificates and consents from all beneficiaries, to justify rectification of the grant. There was no opposition to the application, and the beneficiaries had agreed to the redistribution of the estate and replacement of deceased beneficiaries. The court held that rectification of the grant was necessary to enable the surviving administrators to complete the administration and distribution of the estate in accordance with the wishes of the beneficiaries as set out in the supporting affidavit. The orders were granted as sought, allowing the surviving...

Court Disposition

application for rectification of grant allowed

Orders

  • The grant of letters of administration issued on 13/2/96 is rectified and reissued to John Ruchiri Githinji and Henry Kamau Githinji.
  • The two remaining administrators are allowed to complete the distribution of the estate.