[2015] KEHC 2219 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 2219 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law. Despite the Director of Children Services not filing a report due to a moratorium on foreign adoptions, the Kenya National Adoption Committee had approved the applicants, and the Swedish authorities...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 2219 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: P D A C; Applicant: E C C; Respondent: Director of Children Services
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 132 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
LA Achode
Legal Topics
International Adoption, Child Welfare, Best Interest of Child
Source Language
en
Family and Children International Adoption Child Welfare Best Interest of Child

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P D A C

Applicant

E C C

Applicant

Director of Children Services

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether the moratorium on foreign adoptions affects the applicants' eligibility.
  3. 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interest of the child.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law. Despite the Director of Children Services not filing a report due to a moratorium on foreign adoptions, the Kenya National Adoption Committee had approved the applicants, and the Swedish authorities confirmed recognition of the adoption. The child had been abandoned, declared free for adoption, and had bonded with the applicants during foster care. The court determined that dispensing with the Director's report was justified in the circumstances, as the best interests of the child would be served by granting the adoption. The applicants were thus allowed to adopt the...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants, P D A C and E C C, are allowed to adopt Baby S J, who shall be known as J D E C.
  • The child's date of birth is presumed to be 20th June, 2013.