[2018] KEHC 4767 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established a strong likelihood that placing the company under administration would yield better results for creditors than immediate liquidation. The evidence showed that the company.s business, particularly its agricultural operations in Kajiado County, remained viable but...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 4767 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert Otieno Gero and 57 creditors; Respondent: Petitioner (unnamed); Defendant: Small and Medium Entrepreneurial Resource Centre Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Insolvency Cause 24 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Petition / Ruling on Application for Administration Order
- Outcome
- application for administration order granted
- Judges
- RB Ngetich
- Legal Topics
- Insolvency Administration, Company Management, Creditor Rights, Winding Up Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Otieno Gero and 57 creditors
Applicant
Petitioner (unnamed)
Respondent
Small and Medium Entrepreneurial Resource Centre Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Petition / Ruling on Application for Administration Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether placing the company under administration is likely to achieve a better outcome for creditors than liquidation.
- 2 Whether an administration order should be issued in respect of the company.
- 3 Whether an administrator should be appointed to manage the affairs of the company.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a strong likelihood that placing the company under administration would yield better results for creditors than immediate liquidation. The evidence showed that the company.s business, particularly its agricultural operations in Kajiado County, remained viable but was hampered by mismanagement. The respondent did not challenge the applicant.s assertions regarding viability. The court determined that administration would allow the company to continue operating while providing an opportunity for creditors to be paid, thus serving the interests of both parties. Accordingly, the court issued an administration order and directed the Official...
Court Disposition
application for administration order granted
Orders
- Administration order issued against Small and Medium Entrepreneurial Resource Centre Limited.
- Official Receiver to appoint an Administrator from the Registered Insolvency Practitioners for the company.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL AND ADMIRALTY DIVISION-MILIMANI
INSOLVENCY PETITION NO.24 OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTREPRENEURIAL RESOURCE CENTRE LIMITED
IN THE MATTER OF THE INSOLVENCY ACT NO18 OF 2015
R U L I N G
The Applicant filed Notice of Motion dated 1st March 2018 seeking the following orders:-
1. That this Court be pleased to issue an administration order in respect of SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTREPRENEURIAL RESOURCE CENTRE LIMITED.
2. That this Court to appoint a qualified Administrator to manage the affairs of SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTREPRENEURIAL RESOURCE CENTRE LTD and especially the farms within Kajiado County.
Grounds on the face of the application are that, the 57 creditors listed believe that the Company’s farms in Kajiado County are viable save for mismanagement; and that if the company is managed well; creditors debts will paid; that better outcome will be achieved if the company under administration.
The application is supported by the Affidavit of Robert Otieno Gero, one of the creditors herein who is authorized to swear the affidavit on behalf of 57 creditors listed herein.
He averred that they have learned of the petition of the company herein and that all the creditors stand to suffer irreparable harm if the company is wound up.
That the cumulative indebtedness of the company to the creditors herein is Kshs. 32,899,000.
He averred that the company has been managing green houses for agricultural production at Kajiado County three sites namely Kilimo Garden1, Kilimo Garden2 and Betany; that the management of the green houses is ongoing under the management of the company. He stated that some of the green houses are disused and/or vandalized.
He averred that with proper management, the project is viable. He urged the Court to appoint a competent Administrator.
The Applicants filed submissions restating grounds on the face of the application and averments in the Supporting Affidavit.
The Petitioner never filed response to the application but filed written submissions. Petitioner submitted that Kshs. 21,939,188. 12 is due and owing from the company herein and that Statutory Notice was issued to the company on 10th October 2017 and no response to the petition has been filed.
That the only effort made by the company was a meeting held on 15th January 2018 where it admitted owing Kshs. 12,000,000 and undertook to pay in 90 days.
The Respondent averred that since the company has not made any commitment to pay the admitted amount it would be in the interest of justice to liquidate the company and an official receiver be appointed.
I have considered the application herein. What I wish to consider is whether placing the company herein under administration is likely to achieve better results in settling debts owing to all creditors herein.
Reason given for failure to meet financial obligations by the Defendant are mismanagement of the company. The Applicant contends that the business in Kajiado is viable and that it would run well if properly managed. The averments have not been challenged by the Respondent/Petitioner.
Upon perusal of documents filed and considering averments in the affidavits filed, I find that the Applicant has established that there are high chances that placing the company herein under administration will achieve more results than winding up of the company. It is not disputed that the creditors herein are owed by the company herein. It would be in the interest of justice to adopt a path that would benefit both the company and the creditors. This can be achieved by giving an opportunity to the company to continue running as creditors are being paid.
It would therefore be in the interest of justice to appoint Administrator to manage the affairs of the company herein.
FINAL ORDER
1. Administration order do issue against SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTREPRENEURIAL RESOURCE CENTRE LIMITED.
2. That the Official Receiver do appoint an Administrator from the Registered Insolvency Practitioners to act as Administrator for SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTREPRENEURIAL RESOURCE CENTRE LIMITED.
3. Mention on 11/10/2018 for status report by the Official Receiver.
4. Costs of this application in the cause.
Ruling dated and delivered at Nairobi this 31stday ofJuly,2018
………………………………
RACHEL NGETICH
JUDGE
IN THE PRESENCE OF:
CATHERINE: COURT ASSISTANT
MR. MAKORI: COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
MR. BOSIRE H/B FOR MR. MAKORI FOR CREDITOR/APPLICANT
NO APPEARANCE FOR THE COMPANY