[2013] KEHC 4355 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned at birth, and the biological parents could not be traced, making their consent unnecessary. The applicants demonstrated financial and emotional capability to care for the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 4355 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: A.K.N; Applicant: M.K.M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 158 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Abandoned Children
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A.K.N
Applicant
M.K.M
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the consent of the biological parents is necessary given the abandonment of the child.
- 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child was abandoned at birth, and the biological parents could not be traced, making their consent unnecessary. The applicants demonstrated financial and emotional capability to care for the child, as confirmed by the Adoption Society, the Director of Children’s Services, and the guardian ad litem. The child had bonded with the applicants, who had provided a stable and loving environment. The court concluded that the adoption was in the best interests of the child and allowed the application, granting the applicants full parental rights over the child.
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants, A.K.N and M.K.M, are allowed to adopt Baby E.N.
- The child shall henceforth be known as J.N.K, with date of birth 24th December 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts)
Adoption Cause 158 of 2011
[if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif]
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF B.E.N
A.K.N..................................................................1ST APPLICANT
M.K.M................................................................2ND APPLICANT
J U D G M E N T
The applicants, A.K.N and M.K.M, are husband and wife. They were married 1st May 2004 under the African Christian Marriage and Divorce Act. The 1st applicant is a Police Officer while the 2nd applicant is a Nurse. The applicants have not been blessed with children of their own due to biological reasons. They wish to adopt a child. They have applied to this court to be allowed to adopt baby E.N (the child). The child was presumed to have been born on 24th December 2009. She was found abandoned at Embakasi Jua Kali Estate in Nairobi on the same day. A report was made to Embakasi Police Station on the same day. The child was admitted at Kenyatta National Hospital on the same day that she was found. She was transferred to Nest Children’s Home on 29th April 2010. She was committed by the Nairobi Children’s Court to the custody of the said Children’s Home on the same day pending formal adoption proceedings. The applicants were given custody of the child for mandatory foster care pending adoption pursuant to a foster care agreement which was signed on 23rd July 2010. They took custody of the child on the same day. Since then, the child has been in the custody and care of the applicants.
Prior to the hearing of the adoption, the Adoption Society, Little Angels Network, prepared a report which is filed in court. They also issued a certificate declaring the child free for adoption. The certificate is dated 21st July 2010. The Director of Children’s Services prepared a report which is on record. The guardian ad litem, J.N.K, prepared a report which has been filed in court. All the reports are favourable and recommend that the court allows the applicants to adopt the child. I have evaluated the facts of this adoption. This is a local adoption. It is evident that the applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements pertaining to the adoption of the child. The consent of the biological parents of the child was dispensed with since the child was abandoned at birth. They cannot be traced to give their consent. This court is satisfied that the applicants are qualified and able to take care of the child. The home visits by the guardian ad litem, the Adoption Society and the Director of the Children Services established that the applicants have the financial capability to provide for the upkeep and education of the child. This court observed that the applicants with the child in court. It was evident that in the period that the applicants have had the custody of the child, the child has bonded well with them. The child considers the applicants her parents.
This court formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants. I allow the applicants’ application for adoption. The applicants, A.K.N and M.K.M, are hereby allowed to adopt Baby E.N. Henceforth, the child shall be known as J.N.K. His date of birth shall be 24th December 2009. G.M.N, brother to the 1st applicant, shall be the legal guardian of the child should such eventuality arise. I direct the Registrar General to enter this order in the adoption register. I hereby discharge the guardian ad litem. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 12th DAY OF APRIL, 2013
L. KIMARU
JUDGE