[2014] KEHC 7268 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant lacked legal capacity to seek restraining orders as he was not a holder of a grant of representation. No administrator had been appointed, making the request for removal and substitution of the 2nd petitioner as administrator premature and untenable. The application for reasonable...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 7268 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Charlene Afodzoh Agisu; Respondent: Lilian Khavugwi Ganira; Respondent: Wilfridah Vulegani Ganira
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1741 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Letters of Administration, Reasonable Provision, Removal of Administrator
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charlene Afodzoh Agisu
Applicant
Lilian Khavugwi Ganira
Respondent
Wilfridah Vulegani Ganira
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has legal capacity to seek restraining orders against intermeddling with the estate.
- 2 Whether the removal and substitution of the 2nd petitioner as administrator is tenable before a grant of letters of administration has been issued.
- 3 Whether reasonable provision can be made for a dependent at this stage and on the basis of the present application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant lacked legal capacity to seek restraining orders as he was not a holder of a grant of representation. No administrator had been appointed, making the request for removal and substitution of the 2nd petitioner as administrator premature and untenable. The application for reasonable provision for a dependent was not properly grounded in law, as it was not premised on Section 26 of the Law of Succession Act and lacked supporting material as required by Section 28. Furthermore, the dependent in question was already listed as a survivor in the petition, and the matter was at an early stage, with confirmation of grant not yet arising. The application was...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 15th November 2012 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.
- A grant of letters of administration intestate to be made to Lilian Khavugwi Ganira and Wilfridah Vulegani Ganira in terms of their petition dated 27th June 2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1741 OF 2012
IN THE ESTATE OF ADANGA AGISU (DECEASED)
RULING
1. The application dated 15th November 2012 seeks three principal orders – the restraining of the respondents from intermeddling with the estate, the removal of the 2nd petitioner as administrator of the estate and the making of reasonable provision for Charlene Afodzoh Agisu.
2. I must state from the outset that the said application is not well thought out; it is misconceived and unmerited.
3. In the first place, the applicant seeks orders to restrain intermeddling by the respondents. The said applicant is not the holder of a grant of representation with respect to the estate of Adanga Agisu, deceased. The estate of the deceased does not vest in him in terms of Section 79 of the Law of Succession Act. He therefore does have legal capacity to obtain restraining orders with respect to the estate.
4. He seeks removal of the 2nd petitioner as administrator and her substitution with himself. I have carefully perused through the court record. I have noted that although the petition herein was gazetted on 19th October 2012, no one has yet been appointed as administrator of the estate and a grant of letters of administration intestate has not been made to anyone. Consequently, no administrator of the estate exists and the issue therefore of the removal and substitution of such administrator should not arise.
5. He asks for reasonable provision to be made to Charlene Afodzoh Agisu as a dependent. Such application is made under Section 26 of the Law of Succession Act, yet the application before me is not premised on the provision. I also note that the affidavit in support does not have the material appropriate for the purpose of the exercise of the discretion under Section 26 of the Act. The circumstances to be taken into account in the making of the order are set out in Section 28 of the Act. The affidavit in support has not disclosed material that would bring out the circumstances set out in Section 28 of the Act.
6. Moreover, reasonable provision is sought where a person who is entitled to a share in the estate is disinherited or inadequately provided for. In intestacy this is apparent where the person has not been listed in the petition as a survivor of the deceased or is not among the heirs listed in the confirmation application. In this case Charlene Afodzoh is listed as a survivor of the deceased, and we are at the very early stages of the matter and the question of confirmation has not yet arisen.
7. Instead of filing this ill-conceived application, the applicant ought to have objected to the making of the grant to the petitioner once the cause was gazetted on 19th October 2012.
8. I am disposed to make the following orders:-
That the application dated 15th November 2012 is hereby dismissed with costs to the respondents.
That as there is no pending objection, I direct that a grant of letters of administration intestate be made to Lilian Khavugwi Ganira and Wilfridah Vulegani Ganira in terms of their petition dated 27th June 2012.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this31st DAY OF January, 2014.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE