[2013] KEHC 1184 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 1184 (KLR)

The court found that the grant of probate sought to be revoked did not exist, as it was allegedly made before the deceased's death, which is legally impossible. The court held that it cannot act in vain by revoking a non-existent grant, rendering the application incompetent and subject to dismissal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 1184 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Janet Nzisa Ndegwa; Respondent: George Musyoka Mwilu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1206 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondents
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Probate and Administration, Revocation of Grant, Wills, Executor Appointment
Source Language
en
Family and Children Probate and Administration Revocation of Grant Wills Executor Appointment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Janet Nzisa Ndegwa

Applicant

George Musyoka Mwilu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the court can revoke a grant of probate allegedly made before the deceased's death.
  2. 2 Whether the application for revocation of grant is competent where the grant sought to be revoked does not exist.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the grant of probate sought to be revoked did not exist, as it was allegedly made before the deceased's death, which is legally impossible. The court held that it cannot act in vain by revoking a non-existent grant, rendering the application incompetent and subject to dismissal.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondents

Orders

  • The application dated 18th November 2009 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.