[2013] KEHC 6387 (KLR)
The court found that the core issue causing the deadlock in the administration of the estate was the petitioners' failure to address the procedural queries raised by the Principal Deputy Registrar, particularly regarding the status of the second petitioner, the authenticity of the Chief's letter, and the listing of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 6387 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Eric Waturu Mwaura; Applicant: David Kamau Waturu; Respondent: Joseph Mungai Mwaura
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1538 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Appointment of Joint Administrator
- Outcome
- Petitioners directed to comply with Registrar's requirements within thirty days; matter to be mentioned thereafter for further orders.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Administration of Estates, Appointment of Administrator
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eric Waturu Mwaura
Applicant
David Kamau Waturu
Applicant
Joseph Mungai Mwaura
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Appointment of Joint Administrator
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Joseph Mungai Mwaura should be appointed as joint administrator of the estate with Eric Waturu Mwaura.
- 2 Whether the petitioners have complied with procedural requirements for gazettement and administration of the estate.
- 3 Whether the delay in gazettement and addressing the Registrar's queries is justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the core issue causing the deadlock in the administration of the estate was the petitioners' failure to address the procedural queries raised by the Principal Deputy Registrar, particularly regarding the status of the second petitioner, the authenticity of the Chief's letter, and the listing of beneficiaries. The court held that until these issues are resolved and the cause is properly gazetted, no substantive orders regarding the appointment of administrators or objections can be entertained. The processes initiated by the respondent were deemed premature, as the proper platform for objections is only available after gazettement. The court therefore directed the...
Court Disposition
Petitioners directed to comply with Registrar's requirements within thirty days; matter to be mentioned thereafter for further orders.
Orders
- Petitioners to address the issues raised by the Principal Deputy Registrar within thirty (30) days.
- Matter to be mentioned after thirty (30) days for further orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MILIMANI
SUCC CAUSE NO: 1538 OF 2010
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF BONIFACE MWAURA WATURU – (DECEASED)
RULING
Boniface Mwaura Waturu died on 12th July 2009. Representation to his estate was sought by Eric Waturu Mwaura and David Kamau Waturu on 30th July 2010. The prayers lodged in court indicated that he was survived by four children – Scholar Nyakio, Victoria Wambui, Eric Waturu and Mary Wanjiru Mwaura.
The petition was not gazetted as a caveat was lodged in the cause on 21st December 2010 by M/s. Waithira Mwangi & Co. Advocates, on behalf of Joseph Mungai Mwaura. This was followed by an application by way of a summons general dated 30th May 2011 by the said Joseph Mungai Mwaura, seeking restraining orders and that the proceeds from the income generating assets be deposited in a joint interest earning account. This application was heard by Njagi J and preservatory orders granted on 3rd May 2012.
Joseph Mungai Mwaura filed another application on 11th July 2012. He seeks that he be appointed as joint administrator of the estate with Eric Waturu Mwaura. He argues that the estate is being wasted as there are no administrators in place. This application is strongly opposed by Eric Waturu Mwaura who has sworn an affidavit in reply, on 5th November 2012, filed in court on 10th December 2012.
The cause herein was filed on 30th July 2010. It has not been gazetted todate. The gazettement of the case will open the way for the lodging of objections to the grant being made to the petitioners, and it will give a platform to Joseph Mungai Mwaura to argue his case. It would appear that the processes which he has been filing herein, which in my view are misconceived, are informed by fact that he has not yet gotten the right opportunity to file a proper action. It is the non-gazettement of the cause which is causing all the trouble.
It would appear that the petitioners are to blame for the delay. There is a minute in the court record, by the Principal Deputy Registrar, made on 14th October 2010, which has not been acted on by the petitioners. The minute reads:
“-David to be indicated as beneficiary in P&A 5 if he is one, if not his relationship to the deceased is to be explained by the chief.
-Chief's letter is to be in the original.
-Status of deceased widow is to be
insecured.”
My understanding of the minute is that the status of the second petitioner, David Kamau Waturu, is not clear. In the petition, form P&A 80, the petitioners describe themselves as bringing the petition in their capacity as sons of the deceased. This would make David Kamau Waturu a surviving child of the deceased. Yet in the affidavit in support of the petition, form P&A 5, David Kamau Waturu is not listed as a survivor of the deceased. The letter from the Chief of Ngararia Location dated 27th August 2009 does not list him either among the children who survived the deceased. The other issue is that the Chief's letter dated 27th August 2009 is a photocopy, the Principal Deputy Registrar has required that an original letter be filed. The issue of the widow should not arise as the Chief's letter indicates that she is also dead.
The matters raised by the Principal Deputy Registrar should be addressed so that the deadlock in the cause can be unlocked. I therefore hereby give the petitioners thirty (30) days to address the issues raised in the minute I have referred to. The matter shall be mentioned after thirty (30) days for further orders.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 5th DAY OF July, 2013.
W. M. MUSYOKA
JUDGE