[2005] KEHC 2237 (KLR)
The court held that the procedural requirements for amending pleadings under Order VI A rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules do not apply to applications made under the Probate and Administration Rules, as the latter have their own procedures. The use of Chamber Summons instead of Form 104 does not render the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 2237 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Christopher Kiplagat Kiniga (Deceased); Respondent: Mr. Momanyi; Applicant: Mrs. Manani
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 185 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Probate Procedure, Application of Civil Procedure Rules
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Kiplagat Kiniga (Deceased)
Applicant
Mr. Momanyi
Respondent
Mrs. Manani
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an application to amend a summons for revocation of grant under the Probate and Administration Rules can be brought by way of Chamber Summons instead of Form 104.
- 2 Whether Order VI A rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules applies to amendments in probate matters.
- 3 Whether the dating of the proposed amendment before leave is obtained prejudices the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the procedural requirements for amending pleadings under Order VI A rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules do not apply to applications made under the Probate and Administration Rules, as the latter have their own procedures. The use of Chamber Summons instead of Form 104 does not render the application fatally defective, and the fact that the proposed amendment was dated before leave was granted does not prejudice the respondent. The court found no merit in the respondent's objections and allowed the application to amend the summons for revocation of grant, directing that the amended motion be filed within fourteen days. Costs of the application were awarded to the...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The application to amend the summons for revocation of grant is allowed.
- The amended motion shall be filed within fourteen days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Probate & Administration Cause 185 of 2001
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER KIPLAGAT KINIGA – DECEASED
RULING
The application before me is for orders to amend an earlier summons for revocation of a grant. It is taken out under rules 49 and 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules.
The application is however opposed by the respondents whose contention it is, that the same is fatally defective as it is brought by way of Chamber Summons, instead of Summons under Form 104 of the Probate and Administration Forms.
It was the submission of Mr. Momanyi for the respondent that the applicant has to comply with Order VI A rule 7 of Civil Procedure rules, and that even then it would only apply after leave to amend has been obtained.
It was also his ground that the proposed amendment was dated before leave had been obtained. He relied on the case of Stockman Rozen Kenya Ltd v Da Gama Rose Group of Companies Ltd H.C.C.C. [2002] I KLR 572, which unfortunately would not apply in this instance as it revolved around the issue of amendment of pleadings and the issue of a new cause of action arising in a civil suit.
I am inclined to agree with Mrs. Manani’s contention that Order VI A rule 7 aforementioned would only apply to amendments of pleadings as the heading denotes, in civil applications, and not in an application of this nature whose procedure is catered for under the Probate and Administration Rules, and in any event the said Order, is not one of the Civil Procedure Orders, which are mentioned in Rule 63 (1) of the Probate and Administration Rules, as applicable to matters arising under the Law of Succession Act.
I find no reason to fault the move to Apply for the orders by way of a Chamber Summons, nor does the fact that the proposed amended motion is dated prejudice the respondent in any way. On those grounds also, I find that this application lacks in merit. I do allow this application and do order that the amended Motion be filed within the next fourteen days. The applicant shall bear the costs of this application.
Dated and delivered at Eldoret this 23rd day of June 2005.
JEANNE GACHECHE JUDGE
Delivered in the presence of: No appearance for applicant No appearance for respondent