[2006] KEHC 1760 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, Damarie Wanjiku Wachira, failed to prove she was married to the deceased, either by statutory or customary law. The objector's evidence, including letters from the Area Chief and District Commissioner and testimony from the deceased's mother, was unchallenged and credible. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1760 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Damarie Wanjiku Wachira; Applicant: George Gakuo Wachira; Respondent: Objector (brother to the deceased); Respondent: Susan Muthoni Kagori
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Succession Cause 1172 of 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- grant revoked; protest upheld
- Judges
- KH Rawal
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Grant Revocation, Proof of Marriage, Customary Law Marriage
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Damarie Wanjiku Wachira
Applicant
George Gakuo Wachira
Applicant
Objector (brother to the deceased)
Respondent
Susan Muthoni Kagori
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Damarie Wanjiku Wachira was legally or customarily married to the deceased and thus entitled to benefit from the estate.
- 2 Whether the grant of representation issued to Damarie Wanjiku Wachira and George Gakuo Wachira should be revoked.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, Damarie Wanjiku Wachira, failed to prove she was married to the deceased, either by statutory or customary law. The objector's evidence, including letters from the Area Chief and District Commissioner and testimony from the deceased's mother, was unchallenged and credible. The applicant did not testify or provide evidence to support her claim. Consequently, the court held that the applicant was not a wife of the deceased and was not entitled to benefit from the estate. The grant of representation previously issued to the applicant and her co-petitioner was revoked due to lack of legal standing.
Court Disposition
grant revoked; protest upheld
Orders
- The grant of representation made to Damarie Wanjiku Wachira and George Gakuo Wachira on 4th August, 1995 is revoked.
- The protestors are at liberty to file further proceedings as per law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Succession Cause 1172 of 1998
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DANIEL MUCHOGO KAGORI – (DECEASED)
JUDGMENT
The objection proceedings herein was heard ex-parte after I was satisfied that the Petitioner/Respondent was duly served and from the past records of non-appearance and non-availability of the Petitioner before the court.
The Objector and his witness testified before the court to support the protest filed on 11th January, 2002.
In short, the Objector who is a brother to the deceased, testified that the Petitioner herein was not married to the deceased. He produced a letter dated 14th February, 2001 from the Area Chief, Kiamathaga Location addressed to District Officer, Kieni East Division stating inter alia that he had heard the dispute between the Petitioner and father of the deceased when they came on 3rd March, 1998 after the Petitioner claimed that she was the wife of the deceased. He also stated that six elders were also called by him on 28th April, 2000 who stated that the Petitioner was one of the many girl friends of the deceased and denied that she was a wife of the deceased. He then opined that there was no marriage ceremony performed and thus they were not legally or traditionally married.
He also produced a letter dated 27th March, 2001 from D.C. Nyeri, addressed to the Public Trustee, confirming that the deceased herein survived only by his mother Susan Muthoni Kagori.
The said mother also testified and reiterated that the deceased was not married and that she did not know Damarie Wanjiku and that she has never met her even in the court during previous proceedings.
With the evidence before me, which is not controverted, I do accept the contention of the protestors that the Petitioner Damarie Wanjiku Wachira is not a wife of the deceased.
The Petitioner has filed her response to the protest but in absence of her testimony to prove the validity of her averments, unfortunately I cannot consider the same.
In the premises I do not have any option but to revoke the grant of representation made to Damarie Wanjiku Wachira and George Gakuo Wachira on 4th August, 1995.
The protestors are thus at liberty to file further proceedings as per law.
Dated and signed at Nairobi this 6th day of July, 2006.
K.H. RAWAL
JUDGE
6. 7.2006