[2013] KEHC 1153 (KLR)
The court found that the administrators failed to provide any valid explanation for not distributing the estate as per the confirmed grant. Issues raised by the administrators, such as pending accounts or alleged disposal of some assets, were not sufficient to justify the delay, especially since the assets in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 1153 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Paul Muragu Mwangi; Respondent: Eliud Kariuki
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 2211 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Distribution of Estate
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Administration of Estates, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Muragu Mwangi
Applicant
Eliud Kariuki
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Distribution of Estate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the administrators have failed to distribute the estate as required by the confirmed grant.
- 2 Whether the court should direct the administrators or the Deputy Registrar to effect transfer of assets to the beneficiaries.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the administrators failed to provide any valid explanation for not distributing the estate as per the confirmed grant. Issues raised by the administrators, such as pending accounts or alleged disposal of some assets, were not sufficient to justify the delay, especially since the assets in question were not specified and did not affect the distribution of the remaining estate. The court held that the administrators must complete the administration and distribute the assets to the beneficiaries in accordance with the certificate of confirmation of grant within 60 days.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Administrators to complete administration and distribute the estate to beneficiaries in accordance with the certificate of confirmation of grant within 60 days.
- Matter to be mentioned after 60 days to monitor compliance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
SUCC CAUSE NO. 2211 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF EVANSON MWANGI MURANG'U - DECEASED
RULING
The application dated 18th February 2013 is by a beneficiary, Paul Muragu Mwangi, a son of the deceased. The principal prayer in the application is that the court do direct the administrators to distribute the estate to the beneficiaries without further delay. He asks that in the alternative the court do order the Deputy Registrar to sign all the relevant documents to effect transfer of the assets to the beneficiaries.
The applicant avers in his affidavit sworn on 18th February 2013 that the grant was confirmed on 31st March 2009 and rectified on 23rd September 2010. Since then the administrators have not taken steps to distribute the estate.
Upon being served with the application, the administrators replied through Eliud Kariuki, who swore an affidavit on 25th April 2013. He accuses the applicant of frustrating the exercise of distributing the estate by failing to account for rent collected from one of the estates, being Plot No. 336/322. He has also be accused of disposing of some of the assets.
I have perused the record. I have noted that the grant herein was confirmed on 31st March 2009 and rectified on 23rd September 2010. The assets have been allocated to the beneficiaries according to the certificate of confirmation of grant on record.
After carefully going through the replying affidavit sworn by Eliud Kariuki, I have been unable to get a single explanation for the failure by the administrators to facilitate vesting of the assets in the names of the beneficiaries. He says that there is an issue of accounts relating to one of the assets – the pendency of that issue does not in any way, in my view affect distribution. He alleges that the applicant has disposed of some assets. The alleged assets are not disclosed, and in any event the alleged disposal does not explain why the assets that are unaffected by the unlawful disposal have not been distributed to those entitled to them.
The application dated 18th February 2013 is merited. The administrators have 60 days to complete administration of the estate by distributing the assets following the scheme set out in the certificate of confirmation of grant dated 31st March 2009 and amended on 23rd September 2010. The matter shall be mentioned after 60 days to monitor compliance. Costs of the application shall be borne by the estate.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 8th DAY OF November, 2013.
W.M. MUSYOKA
JUDGE