[2014] KEHC 6954 (KLR)
The court found that the caveator had properly filed a caveat and provided an address for service, entitling him to notification and an opportunity to be heard before the confirmation of grant. The court registry failed to notify the caveator, and the administrators proceeded with the confirmation without his...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 6954 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mwamunye Nyamawi; Respondent: Faith Mwaka Mwangovya; Respondent: Brian Mwakunde Ghonar
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 116 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Revoke Confirmed Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed in part; confirmed grant revoked; summons for confirmation to be heard afresh
- Judges
- JV Juma
- Legal Topics
- Probate and Administration, Confirmation of Grant, Caveats in Succession, Right to Be Heard
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mwamunye Nyamawi
Applicant
Faith Mwaka Mwangovya
Respondent
Brian Mwakunde Ghonar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Revoke Confirmed Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the confirmed grant issued on 9th May, 2013 should be revoked due to failure to notify the caveator of the confirmation proceedings.
- 2 Whether the caveator was entitled to be heard before the confirmation of grant in light of the caveat filed.
- 3 Whether the administrators complied with the procedural requirements under the Law of Succession Rules.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the caveator had properly filed a caveat and provided an address for service, entitling him to notification and an opportunity to be heard before the confirmation of grant. The court registry failed to notify the caveator, and the administrators proceeded with the confirmation without his participation. This procedural lapse violated the caveator's rights under Rule 15(8) of the Law of Succession Rules. Consequently, the confirmed grant issued on 9th May, 2013 was revoked, and the court directed that the summons for confirmation of grant be heard and determined afresh, ensuring the caveator's participation.
Court Disposition
application allowed in part; confirmed grant revoked; summons for confirmation to be heard afresh
Orders
- The grant confirmed on 9th May, 2013 is revoked.
- The summons for confirmation of grant shall be heard and determined afresh.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 116 OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GILBERT GHONAR NGAMBA (DECEASED)
MWAMUYE NYAMAWI………………..……………………………………CAVEATOR
RULING
By way of a Notice of Motion dated 13th June, 2013 the caveator hereinMWAMUYE NYAMAWIhas sought inter alia the following orders:
“3. THAT this Honourable court be pleased to review and set aside the order and proceedings made on the 9th day of May, 2013 and the subsequent certificate of confirmation of the Grant dated 4th day of June, 2013 and do order that the caveat dated 12th April, 2013 and the summons for confirmation of the Grant dated the 22nd day of March, 2013 be heard and determined inter-partes.
4. THAT alternatively, this court be pleased to revoke and/or annul the said Grant confirmed on the 9th day of May, 2013.
5. THAT the Administrators be condemned to costs of this application.”
The application was supported by the affidavit of the caveator dated 13th June, 2013. The application arises from a claim which the caveator had against the deceased GILBERT GHONAR NGOMBA during his (the deceased’s) lifetime. The claim arose from a judgment issued in favour of the caveator against the deceased in respect of a road traffic accident vide Mombasa Civil Suit No. 398 of 2004. After a full hearing the trial court awarded damages to the tune of Kshs. 909,800/= plus costs and interest in favour of the caveator all of which translated to Kshs. 1,242,947/=. Prior to his death the deceased had been liquidating this judgment amount and had already paid a total fo Kshs. 520,000/= by the time of his death on 20th December, 2011. This left a balance due to the caveator of Kshs. 769,840/= which sum he seeks to obtain from the estate of the deceased. To protect his interest and claim the caveator did on 12th April, 2013 file in this Succession Cause a caveat also dated 12th April, 2013.
After the death of the deceased FAITH MWAKA MWANGOVYA and BRIAN MWAKUNDE GHONAR (hereinafter referred to jointly as ‘the administrators’) applied for and obtained letters of administration in respect of the estate of the deceased. A Grant of letters of administration was issued on 19th September, 2012. On 24th March, 2013 the administrators filed a summons for confirmation of Grant dated 22nd March, 2013. On 9th May, 2013 the summons was approved and on 4th June, 2013 a confirmed Grant was issued to the two administrators. The caveator thereafter filed this application.
I have carefully perused the written submissions filed by both parties. The caveator did in compliance with the law file a caveat on 12th April, 2012. As such he ought to have been notified by the registry before any further action on probate was taken. This was not done. There is no evidence that the caveator was notified of the summons for confirmation of Grant or the date the same was listed for hearing yet a clear address for service had been provided. This was an error on the part of the court registry. The issue of the caveat was not noticed at the time of confirmation of the Grant. The caveator had a right to be heard in line with Rule 15 (8) of the Law of Succession Rules. I find that the Grant ought not to have been confirmed before the caveator had been granted a hearing. I therefore allow prayer (4) of this application. I hereby revoke the Grant confirmed on 9th May, 2013. I further direct that the summons for confirmation of Grant be heard and determined afresh. Each party to meet their own costs.
Dated and delivered in Mombasa this 21st day of February, 2014.
M. ODERO
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Sichale for Applicant
Ms. Kayata h/b for Respondent
Court Clerk Mutisya