[2018] KEHC 7756 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 7756 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, as administrators of the estate, had identified additional assets that were omitted from the original certificate of confirmation of grant due to missing land reference numbers. The court held that it is fair and just to rectify the grant to include these assets, ensuring that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 7756 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Patricia Munanye Kithome; Applicant: Alice Sylvia Kithome
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitui
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 10 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
LN Mutende
Legal Topics
Succession, Rectification of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Identification of Assets
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Rectification of Grant Distribution of Estate Identification of Assets

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patricia Munanye Kithome

Applicant

Alice Sylvia Kithome

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of confirmation of grant should be rectified to include additional assets identified after the initial confirmation.
  2. 2 Whether the newly identified assets should be distributed equally among all beneficiaries.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, as administrators of the estate, had identified additional assets that were omitted from the original certificate of confirmation of grant due to missing land reference numbers. The court held that it is fair and just to rectify the grant to include these assets, ensuring that the entire estate is properly administered and distributed among all beneficiaries. The urgency was underscored by the risk of third-party alienation of the properties. The application was therefore allowed, and the certificate of grant was ordered to be rectified to include the specified assets, to be distributed equally among the beneficiaries.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The certificate of grant issued on 12th June, 2013 shall be rectified to include the specified assets.
  • The newly included assets shall be distributed in equal shares among all beneficiaries.