[2008] KEHC 1298 (KLR)
The court found that the administrators had consistently failed to perform their statutory duties, including failing to apply for confirmation of the grant, failing to file accounts despite court orders, mismanaging the estate, and disregarding the interests of other beneficiaries and the surviving spouse. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 1298 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Edward Mukundi Karanja; Applicant: Veronica Wanjiku Karanja; Applicant: Emmanuel Mwangi Karanja; Respondent: Four sons of the deceased (unnamed)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Succession Cause 1115 of 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- grant of representation revoked; new administrators appointed; costs awarded against previous administrators
- Judges
- KH Rawal
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Administration of Estates, Duties of Administrators, Failure to Account, Beneficiary Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Mukundi Karanja
Applicant
Veronica Wanjiku Karanja
Applicant
Emmanuel Mwangi Karanja
Applicant
Four sons of the deceased (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the administrators failed in their statutory duties under the Law of Succession Act and Probate and Administration Rules.
- 2 Whether the grant of representation should be revoked due to non-disclosure, failure to confirm the grant, and mismanagement of the estate.
- 3 Whether the administrators should be personally liable for costs and required to account for the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the administrators had consistently failed to perform their statutory duties, including failing to apply for confirmation of the grant, failing to file accounts despite court orders, mismanaging the estate, and disregarding the interests of other beneficiaries and the surviving spouse. The administrators' conduct amounted to a violation of the Law of Succession Act and the Probate and Administration Rules. Their failure to respond to the summons for revocation or to adduce any evidence in their defense further demonstrated their indifference and neglect. The court concluded that these failures justified the revocation of the grant of representation and the appointment...
Court Disposition
grant of representation revoked; new administrators appointed; costs awarded against previous administrators
Orders
- The grant of representation issued to the four administrators on 26th October, 1993 is revoked forthwith.
- A fresh grant is to be issued to Edward Mukundi Karanja and Veronica Wanjiku Karanja without the need for filing a new petition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Succession Cause 1115 of 1993
IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF JOSEPH KARANJA – (DECEASED)
RULING
This is one of the matters where the Administrators completely assumed ownership of the estate after being issued with grant of representation of the estate, disregarding the plight of the other beneficiaries.
As per the petition of the four sons of the deceased in respect of the grant of Representation state that they are the elder sons of the deceased and that is why the other siblings, from other houses trusting them, gave their consent and the grant was issued to the four sons on 26th October, 1993.
No action to obtain certificate of confirmation was taken by the Administrators and eventually three objectors namely Edward Mukundi Karanja, Veronica Wanjiku Karanja and Emmanuel Mwangi Karanja filed summons for revocation of grant dated 24th November, 2005.
The summons was filed under the provisions of section 76, 83 and 94 of the Law of Succession Act and Rules 44, 49 and 73 of Probate and Administration Rules as well as all enabling provisions of law.
The objectors raised many issues against the Administrators namely; non disclosure of the fact that the deceased left a surviving spouse, failure to apply for confirmation of the grant, failure to administer the estate with diligence, sales of part of the estate before the confirmation, neglect to get in and avert waste of the assets of the estate, misapplication of the estate and loss and damage to the estate, failure to enforce claims against third parties, etc.
The administrators despite given opportunity have failed to respond either by replying affidavit or by adducing evidence to controvert the claims of the objectors. It is a sheer tragedy that this old matter is is not heard and the Administrators have exhibited total indifference to the plights of other beneficiaries.
I am also perturbed to note that despite given a wake up call by this summons of revocation, the Administrators have refused to file summons for confirmation.
Furthermore, the Administrators have also failed to produce accounts of the estate till to-date, which is their foremost obligation to show that the estate is administered diligently. I further note with dismay that there was an order of this court dated 1st March, 2008 directing the Administrators to file the accounts within 30 days, which is flouted with impunity.
In the evidence adduced by the objectors, it is testified that all the properties disclosed in the petition generate income and the four Administrators are using the same for their own purposes depriving other beneficiaries of their rights to inherit and share. The Administrators have failed to pay land rates and rents on the assets of the estate and a property bearing parcel No.Dagoretti/Kangemi/S73 and S74 were advertised for sale on the Daily Nation of 26th and 27th April, 2007. the objectors were unaware of such action before they saw the advertisements. Their efforts to settle the matter in family meetings have borne no results.
I may pause here and state that even the record of the court file is full of such proposals of settlements by the Administrators on the dates when the matter was fixed for hearing. I have no hesitation to state that those were merely to derail or delay the hearing of the objectors’ case.
It is also evident from the evidence and pleadings that this is a unique case where the Administrators have been flouting or violating all the provisions of the Act and Rules with impunity. I have also heard the evidence that the seriously ailing spouse of the deceased is also not properly looked after from the estate.
I am thus satisfied that the Administrators have failed to perform their respective duties as personal representatives as per Section 76 (d) and 83 of the Act.
I therefore order that the grant of representation issued to the four Administrators on 26th October, 1993 be revoked forthwith.
As this matter has been delayed under unfortunate circumstances, I direct that fresh grant be issued to Edward Mukundi Karanja and Veronica Wanjiku Karanja without the process of filing of petition and consequent process.
The previous Administrators are once again ordered to file the Accounts of the estate from the date of issuance of the grant of representation. i.e. 26th October, 1993 upto the date of this ruling within 3 months hereof.
The previous Administrators also shall pay costs of the objection proceedings personally and not from the estate.
I further direct that the new Administrators to file and serve the summons for confirmation within 21 days from the date of issuance of the grant.
Dated and signed at Nairobi this 16th day of September, 2008.
K.H. RAWAL
JUDGE
16. 9.08