[2010] KEHC 3538 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 3538 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated that certain assets of the deceased were inadvertently omitted from the original succession proceedings and, consequently, from the certificate of confirmation of grant. The omission was not due to fraud or deliberate concealment but was an oversight. The court was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 3538 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Annah Nyakihu Kiama; Petitioner: Isaac Rumen Kiama; Petitioner: Stephen Rumen Kiama; Petitioner: Geoffrey Rumen Kiama
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 27 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
summons for rectification of grant allowed
Judges
JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Omitted Assets, Probate Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Rectification of Grant Distribution of Estate Omitted Assets Probate Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Annah Nyakihu Kiama

Applicant

Isaac Rumen Kiama

Petitioner

Stephen Rumen Kiama

Petitioner

Geoffrey Rumen Kiama

Petitioner

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of confirmation of grant should be rectified to include assets omitted from the original succession proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for rectification of the grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated that certain assets of the deceased were inadvertently omitted from the original succession proceedings and, consequently, from the certificate of confirmation of grant. The omission was not due to fraud or deliberate concealment but was an oversight. The court was satisfied that rectification was necessary to ensure all assets of the deceased are properly distributed in accordance with the law. Therefore, the court allowed the summons for rectification of grant as prayed, permitting the inclusion and distribution of the omitted assets as proposed by the applicant.

Court Disposition

summons for rectification of grant allowed

Orders

  • The certificate of confirmation of grant is rectified to include the omitted assets as listed in the applicant's affidavit.
  • Distribution of the newly included assets shall proceed as proposed by the applicant.