[2005] KEHC 2374 (KLR)
The court found that the orders made on 9th July 2003 and issued on 28th July 2003, which transferred Ngong/Ngong/10249 and Ngong/Ngong/4100 to the executrix, were made in error because the judgment of Hon. Aganyanya J. had expressly excluded these properties from vesting in the executrix. The applicant, as a bona...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 2374 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Rose Agiza Ndeyi Keyonzo; Respondent: Mary Wanjiku Kapaito; Respondent: Teresia Nasieku Kineia
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 292 of 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review and Joinder
- Outcome
- application allowed; previous orders reviewed and varied
- Legal Topics
- Probate and Administration, Revocation of Grant, Will Interpretation, Land Title Transfer
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rose Agiza Ndeyi Keyonzo
Applicant
Mary Wanjiku Kapaito
Respondent
Teresia Nasieku Kineia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review and Joinder
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the orders transferring Ngong/Ngong/10249 and Ngong/Ngong/4100 to the executrix were proper in light of the judgment excluding these properties from the will.
- 2 Whether the applicant, as a purchaser of the suit premises, was entitled to be enjoined and heard before cancellation of her title.
- 3 Whether there was an error apparent on the face of the record justifying review or variation of the orders made on 9th July 2003 and issued on 28th July 2003.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the orders made on 9th July 2003 and issued on 28th July 2003, which transferred Ngong/Ngong/10249 and Ngong/Ngong/4100 to the executrix, were made in error because the judgment of Hon. Aganyanya J. had expressly excluded these properties from vesting in the executrix. The applicant, as a bona fide purchaser of Ngong/Ngong/10249, was not served or enjoined in the proceedings that led to the cancellation of her title, constituting a procedural irregularity and breach of natural justice. The court held that there was an error apparent on the face of the record and, in the interest of justice, reviewed and varied the orders to restore the titles to their previous...
Court Disposition
application allowed; previous orders reviewed and varied
Orders
- The order made on 9th July 2003 and issued on 28th July 2003 transferring Ngong/Ngong/10249 and Ngong/Ngong/4100 to Mary Wanjiku Kapaito is reviewed and varied.
- Title Number Ngong/Ngong/10249 shall revert to the previous registered owner, Rose Agiza Ndeyi Keyonzo.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI SUCCESSION CAUSE 292 OF 1991
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTAE OF KAPAITO OLE PARIMBAI (DECEASED)
RULING
The late Kapaito Ole Parimbai (deceased) died testate on 27th October 1990. The grant of Letters of Administration were in the first instance issued to his grand daughter Teresia Nasieku Kineia on 2nd September 1991 and confirmed on 20th March 1992.
Mary Wanjiku Kapaito the third widow of the deceased successfully applied for the revocation of the said grant.
By a well reasoned judgment by Hon. Aganyanya J, delivered on 10th May 2001, the grant of Letters of Administration which was issued to Teresia Nasieku Kineia was revoked and the grant of probate of written will was issued to Mary Wanjiku Kapaito on 10th May 2001.
Before the grant was revoked, Teresia Nasieku Nsieku Kinei had purportedly transferred the property known as Ngong/Ngong/10249 (hereinafter called the suit premises) to Rose Agiza Keyonzo the applicant in this matter. According to the will of the deceased which was upheld by the above judgment, Mary Wanjiru Kapaito is named as the Executrix and the deceased bequeathed to her the suit premises.
Pursuit to the said judgment, and due to the failure of Teresia Nasieku to transfer the suit premises to the Executrix as per the judgment applied to this court for an order directed to the Land Registrar to cancel titles over
NGONG/NGONG/4100
NGONG/NGONG/10249
LTK/ENKARIAK – RONGEMA/789 and issue the same to herself.
That application although served upon Teresia Nasieku was not opposed and therefore the orders were granted as prayed.
The applicant in this present summons who had purchased the suit premises from the previous administrator was not enjoined in those proceedings which lead to the cancellation of her title and the application was not served upon her.
I have carefully read the judgment by Hon. Aganyanya J. especially page 18 where the court made the following observation:
“As regards plot number Ngong/Ngong/10249, though included in the deceased’s will it was agreed by both parties, 3rd objector included that it had been given to Ziporah Naigu (PW 2), but that the respondent had sold it and given Naigu only Kshs.100,000/=. The petitioner herself agreed to have sold this plot at Kshs.350,000/= and that when she gets the balance she would pass it over to the said beneficiary. The issue must rest between the two.”
The court therefore upheld the deceased wishes as expressed in the will except in respect of Title Number Ngong/Ngong/4100 and Ngong/Ngong/10249 (Suit premises) which were not vested upon the executrix.
In view of the above judgment I am of the view that the applicants application dated 1st February 2005 that seeks to enjoin the applicant herein in these proceedings and were to review the orders made and issued on 28th July 2003 has merit.
In this regard, I am of the humble view that there is an error apparent on the face of the record arising from an omission as the attention of the court was not drawn to the said judgment.
Having given careful thought to the said judgment, it is clear the judgment of the court allowed the will as drawn by the deceased but excluded two properties namely Ngong/Ngong 10249 and Ngong/Ngong/4100 from the properties to vest upon the Executrix.
It is clear that when the Executrix made the application seeking for orders of transfer of these properties, she definitely mislead this court into issuing the orders over the two properties which were excluded from the will of the deceased by the court.
Consequently therefore in the interest of justice the order made on 9th July 2003 and issued on 28th July 2003 must be reviewed/varied so that it is in tandem with the judgment of this court to the extent that parcel Number Ngong/Ngong/10249 and Ngong/Ngong/4100 should not have been registered in the name of MARY WANJIKU KAPAITO.
The Title Number Ngong/Ngong/10249 should revert to the previous registered owner ROSE AGIZA NDEYI KEYONZO.
Although there was no application over Ngong/Ngong/4100, upon reading the said judgment it is clear that the two titles were left out of the deceased will and in exercise of the inherent powers vested in this court vide Section 73 of the P & A rules to ensure that the ends of justice are met, I would order that the title known as Ngong/Ngong/4100 should also revert to the persons who were registered as proprietors.
Due to the unique nature of this application each party shall bear their own costs.
It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered this 10th day of June 2005.
MARTHA KOOME JUDGE