[2015] KEHC 4815 (KLR)
The court confirmed the grant issued jointly to Purity Micere Kariuki and Leah Gachui Gitoro, holding that the estate should be distributed in accordance with the proposals and consents filed by each house. The judgment of 18th September 2013, which apportioned 1.5 acres to Leah's house and 3.5 acres to Purity's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 4815 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Purity Micere Kariuki; Applicant: Leah Gachui Gitoro
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 3305 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Confirmation of Grant
- Outcome
- grant confirmed; estate distributed as per consents and proposals of both houses
- Judges
- LA Achode
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Trusts in Land, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Purity Micere Kariuki
Applicant
Leah Gachui Gitoro
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Confirmation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the estate of Kariuki Kagwe should be distributed between the two houses in accordance with the High Court judgment of 18th September 2013.
- 2 How the respective shares of each house should be distributed among the beneficiaries within each household.
- 3 Whether the grant issued on 18th September 2013 should be confirmed as per the proposals of the two administratrices.
Ratio Decidendi
The court confirmed the grant issued jointly to Purity Micere Kariuki and Leah Gachui Gitoro, holding that the estate should be distributed in accordance with the proposals and consents filed by each house. The judgment of 18th September 2013, which apportioned 1.5 acres to Leah's house and 3.5 acres to Purity's house, was upheld. The court found that both houses had reached internal agreements on the distribution of their respective shares, and there was no dispute requiring further adjudication. The court further recognized the trust element in the land, as the deceased held part of the land in trust for his brother's family. The distribution was thus confirmed as per the consents and...
Court Disposition
grant confirmed; estate distributed as per consents and proposals of both houses
Orders
- The grant issued on 18th September 2013 to Purity Micere Kariuki and Leah Gachui Gitoro is confirmed jointly.
- The estate, being land parcel No. Mweruwa/Kanyokora/207, shall be distributed as follows: 1.5 acres to Leah's house and 3.5 acres to Purity's house, in accordance with the consents and proposals filed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
52 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 3305 OF 2004
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KARIUKI KAGWE (DECEASED)
R U L I N G
1. The deceased to whose Estate these proceedings relate is Kariuki Kagwe of Mwerua, who died domiciled in the Republic of Kenya on 14th August 1994. Letters of Administration to all his intestate Estate being land parcel No. Mweruwa/Kanyokora/207, were granted to his widow Purity Micere Kariuki, (hereinafter Purity) and Leah Gachui Gitoro (hereinafter Leah), the widow of his brother Charles Gitoro Kagwe on 18th September 2013. This is because it later emerged that the suit parcel of land measuring 5 acres, although registered in the name of the deceased, was partly held in trust and the deceased and his family lived on the suit parcel of land, together with his brother Charles Gitoro Kagwe and his family.
2. The letters of administration had been issued and confirmed to Purity who had petitioned the Kerugoya court alone, without disclosing the existence of the family of Charles Gitoro Kagwe. Upon becoming aware of the proceedings, Leah successfully applied to the High Court by way of summons under Section 76 of the law of succession Act, seeking to revoke the grant. Hon. Kimaru J heard the matter and entered judgment in her favour on 18th September 2013, revoking the grant together with the certificate of confirmation. In the judgment the court gave 1½ acres of the suit land to the house of Leah and 3½ acres to the house of Purity.
3. Subsequently the two widows filed separate summonses for confirmation of grant with proposals on the mode of distribution of the Estate. Leah’s application is dated 11th March 2014 while Purity’s application is dated 5th April 2014. In the two applications each Administratrix confined herself to the distribution of the portion of the Estate that devolves to the beneficiaries within her household. During the hearing of the applications on 29th April 2015 and by the consent of the parties, the two summonses were consolidated for purposes of confirmation of grant.
4. The house of Leah has four beneficiaries who have filed a consent to distribute their share as follows:
i. Leah Gachui Gitoro
ii. Tabitha Wangithi Gitoro ½ acre to be held jointly
iii. Peter Muriithi Gitoro - ½ acre absolutely
iv. Nahashon Miano Gitoro - ½ acre absolutely
The house of Purity has thirteen beneficiaries therein who have also filed a consent to distribute their portion of the Estate as follows:
i. Purity Micere Kariuki
ii. Irene Wangithi Wachira
iii. Charity Wanjiru Wangome 1 acre for the widow to hold on
iv. Gladys Wanjiku Gichamu behalf of all the seven married
v. Mary Njoki Kariuki daughters.
vi. Janet Wakiini Kariuki
vii. Serah Waruguru Kariuki
viii. Beth Wanjira Kariuki
ix. Peterson Mwangi Kairuki
x. Francis Maina Kairuki
xi. Charles Muthii Kariuki ½ an acre each
xii. John Mundia Kariuki
xiii. Ruth Wemwirua Kariuki (deceased) - her ½ acre share to be held in trust by Purity on behalf of her surviving minor children, P M and M W respectively.
Each of the Applicants has annexed a sketch plan of the suit parcel of land indicating their respective portions of each family. The two maps are almost similar although none has indicated the acreage of each portion.
5. In the circumstances the court confirms the grant issued on 18th September 2013 to the two widows jointly. Their respective portions of the suit parcel of land shall be distributed in accordance with their respective proposals.
6. Leah shall retain her homestead to be held jointly with her daughter Tabitha Wangithii Gitoro to the extent that it measures half an acre. Her two sons, Peter Muriithi Gitoro and Nahashon Miano Gitoro shall each inherit half an acre absolutely in the portion where Leah plants her food crop and coffee as indicated in their respective plans.
Purity and her seven married daughters being:
i. Irene Wangithi Wachira,
ii. Charity Wanjiru Wangome,
iii. Gladys Wanjiku Gichamu
iv. Mary Njoki Kariuki,
v. Janet Wakiini Kariuki
vi. Serah Waruguru Kariuki
vii. Beth Wanjira Kariuki
shall inherit 1 acre from their portion of three and half acres of land. The four sons of Purity being:
i. Peterson Mwangi Kairuki
ii. Francis Maina Kairuki
iii. Charles Muthii Kariuki
iv. John Mundia Kariuki
shall inherit half an acre each.
The remaining half acre shall be held in trust by Purity on behalf of the surviving minor children, of Ruth Wemwirua Kariuki being P M and M W respectively.
7. The family is at liberty to enlist the services of a surveyor to ascertain the sizes of the respective shares if they so deem fit.
It is so ordered.
SIGNED DATEDandDELIVEREDin open court this 20th day of May 2015.
……………………
L. A. ACHODE
JUDGE