[2009] KEHC 73 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 73 (KLR)

The court found that the application for revocation of grant was premature because no grant had actually been issued. The proper procedure for challenging the right to representation is through objection proceedings under Rule 17 of the Probate and Administration Rules, not by revocation. Since all parties agreed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 73 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Mary C. Mibei; Petitioner: Elizabeth Mibei; Petitioner: Grace Mibei; Petitioner: Teresia Mibei
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant and Directions on Representation
Outcome
Revocation proceedings struck out as premature; leave granted for all four widows to apply jointly and severally for grant of letters of administration.
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Letters of Administration, Representation of Survivors, Probate Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Letters of Administration Representation of Survivors Probate Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary C. Mibei

Petitioner

Elizabeth Mibei

Petitioner

Grace Mibei

Petitioner

Teresia Mibei

Petitioner

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant and Directions on Representation

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration intestate issued to three widows should be revoked for excluding the eldest widow.
  2. 2 Whether the proper procedure was followed in seeking revocation instead of filing objection proceedings under Rule 17 of the Probate and Administration Rules.
  3. 3 Who is entitled to represent the estate of the deceased and apply for the grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for revocation of grant was premature because no grant had actually been issued. The proper procedure for challenging the right to representation is through objection proceedings under Rule 17 of the Probate and Administration Rules, not by revocation. Since all parties agreed that all four widows should jointly and severally apply for the grant, the court directed that a fresh application be filed by all four widows, naming all survivors with their ages and relationships to the deceased. The court struck out the revocation proceedings as a nullity and gave directions for the correct procedure to be followed, ensuring that all entitled survivors are...

Court Disposition

Revocation proceedings struck out as premature; leave granted for all four widows to apply jointly and severally for grant of letters of administration.

Orders

  • Revocation proceedings are struck out as premature.
  • Leave is granted for all four widows to file a fresh application for grant of letters of administration, naming all survivors with their ages and relationships.