[2014] KEHC 8481 (KLR)
The court found that the application dated 20th April 2012 did not comply with the order of 2nd March 2012, which specifically required that the two widows of the deceased, Bernice Wambui Kibunja and Monica Wangari Kibunja, be included as administrators and that each select a co-administrator from their respective...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 8481 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Julius Murimi; Applicant: Peter Macharia; Applicant: Paul Karanja Hezekiah; Applicant: Ann Ruguru Hezekiah; Respondent: Joel Mwaura Maina; Respondent: Gilbert Kihara; Respondent: Bernice Wambui Kibunja; Respondent: Monica Wangari Kibunja
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1779 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Appointment of Administrators
- Outcome
- application dismissed for non-compliance with prior court order
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Administrators, Compliance With Court Orders, Succession Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julius Murimi
Applicant
Peter Macharia
Applicant
Paul Karanja Hezekiah
Applicant
Ann Ruguru Hezekiah
Applicant
Joel Mwaura Maina
Respondent
Gilbert Kihara
Respondent
Bernice Wambui Kibunja
Respondent
Monica Wangari Kibunja
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Appointment of Administrators
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application dated 20th April 2012 complied with the court order of 2nd March 2012 regarding appointment of administrators.
- 2 Whether the two widows of the deceased were properly included as mandated by the court order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application dated 20th April 2012 did not comply with the order of 2nd March 2012, which specifically required that the two widows of the deceased, Bernice Wambui Kibunja and Monica Wangari Kibunja, be included as administrators and that each select a co-administrator from their respective houses. The applicants failed to include the widows and did not demonstrate that the persons seeking appointment as administrators were selected by the widows as mandated. As a result, the application was dismissed for non-compliance with the court's prior order, and the matter was set for mention to facilitate proper appointment of administrators in accordance with the law and...
Court Disposition
application dismissed for non-compliance with prior court order
Orders
- The application dated 20th April 2012 is dismissed with costs.
- The matter is to be mentioned on 27th January 2015 for appointment of administrators.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT
NAIROBI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1779 OF 2009
IN THE ESTATE OF MAINA MURIMA alias KIBUNJA MURIMI – (DECEASED)
RULING
1. On 2nd March 2012, Mugo J. revoked a grant that had been made on 8th January 2007 by the Thika Chief Magistrate’s court. She directed the applicants to select a co-administrator from their respective houses to act jointly with them in applying for a fresh grant which was to be made to four (4) persons to avoid further disagreements.
2. The application dated 20th April 2012 was made in an effort to comply with the order of 2nd March 2012. It is based on the affidavit of Julius Murimi, Peter Macharia, Paul Karanja Hezekiah and Ann Ruguru Hezekiah. It asks that the four of them be appointed as administrators of the estate. They aver in their joint affidavit that they were selected to represent the two houses. They indicate that two family members did not agree with the rest of the family, that is to say Joel Mwaura Maina and Gilbert Kihara.
3. The two filed an affidavit of protest through Joel Mwaura Maina. Their argument is that the order of 2nd March 2012 was to the effect that the two widows be included as administrators and two other persons be selected by the family. The deponent protests that the widows and himself have been excluded. He argues that he and his co-protestor, Gilbert Kihara, are suited to be administrators and ought to be included as such.
4. When the matter came up for directions on 26th March 2014, Mr. Ngige for Mr. Ndumu Kimani for the applicants proposed that the application be disposed of by way of written submissions, while Mr. Anambo holding brief for Mr. Gachie for the respondents proposed that the respondent be given opportunity to give oral evidence.
5. I have carefully studied the application and the rival affidavits and the written submissions filed by the applicants. The application is a fairly straightforward one for appointment of administrators in accord with the order of 2nd March 2012.
6. The order of 2nd March 2012 states as follows:-
“Accordingly, the temporary grant issued to the respondent on 8th January 2007 is hereby revoked. The applicants shall select a co-administrator from their respective houses to act jointly with them in applying for a fresh grant which shall be made to 4 persons to avoid further disagreements.”
7. My understanding of that order is that the applicants in the application dated 14th August 2009 were to select a co-administrator each from their house and the four of them shall then apply for fresh grant. The effect of this is that the two applicants in the application of 14th August 2009 had been identified by the court as the future administrators. The two were mandated to select a person each from their houses.
8. The two applicants in the application of 14th August 2009 were Bernice Wambui Kibunja and Monica Wangari Kibunja, who were also the widows of the deceased. It is these two, and these two only, who had been mandated by the court to select a person each from their respective houses to join them as co-administrators.
9. I agree with the respondents that the order of 2nd March 2012 has not been complied with. The two widows do not feature in the application dated 20th April 2012 and the persons seeking grant have not been selected by them.
10. As the application dated 20th April 2012 does not confirm with the order of 2nd March 2012 it is hereby dismissed with costs.
11. To move this matter forward I do hereby order that this matter be mentioned on 27th January 2015 for appointment of administrators. The two widows of the deceased must attend court on that day together with all their children.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 21st DAY OF November 2014.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE